BTQ.NEO vs. CIFR
BTQ.NEO (BTQ Technologies Corp) and CIFR (Cipher Mining Inc.) are both stocks. BTQ.NEO operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology), while CIFR operates in Capital Markets (Financial Services). Over the past 3 years, BTQ.NEO returned 124.84%/yr vs 114.06%/yr for CIFR. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BTQ.NEO vs. CIFR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
BTQ.NEO is traded in CAD, while CIFR is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CIFR values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BTQ.NEO achieves a -3.81% return, which is significantly lower than CIFR's 54.49% return.
BTQ.NEO
- 1D
- 15.20%
- 1M
- 43.58%
- YTD
- -3.81%
- 6M
- -24.81%
- 1Y
- 73.10%
- 3Y*
- 124.84%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CIFR
- 1D
- -11.95%
- 1M
- 4.75%
- YTD
- 54.49%
- 6M
- 17.48%
- 1Y
- 548.27%
- 3Y*
- 114.06%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BTQ.NEO vs. CIFR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BTQ.NEO BTQ Technologies Corp | -3.81% | 79.95% | 380.49% | 9.33% |
CIFR Cipher Mining Inc. | 54.49% | 203.51% | 22.00% | 132.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between BTQ.NEO and CIFR is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 22, 2023 | 0.16 |
Fundamentals
BTQ.NEO:
CA$939.93M
CIFR:
$9.09B
BTQ.NEO:
-CA$0.11
CIFR:
-$2.33
BTQ.NEO:
1.63K
CIFR:
49.34
BTQ.NEO:
24.66
CIFR:
12.73
BTQ.NEO:
CA$565.50K
CIFR:
$174.98M
BTQ.NEO:
CA$565.50K
CIFR:
-$172.84M
BTQ.NEO:
-CA$14.23M
CIFR:
-$169.22M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BTQ.NEO vs. CIFR — Risk / Return Rank
BTQ.NEO
CIFR
BTQ.NEO vs. CIFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BTQ Technologies Corp (BTQ.NEO) and Cipher Mining Inc. (CIFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BTQ.NEO | CIFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.46 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.82 | 10.63 | -9.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.17 | 20.79 | -19.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BTQ.NEO | CIFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 | 5.12 | -4.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.17 | +0.40 |
Drawdowns
BTQ.NEO vs. CIFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTQ.NEO drawdown since its inception was -84.85%, smaller than the maximum CIFR drawdown of -96.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTQ.NEO and CIFR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BTQ.NEO | CIFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.85% | -96.96% | +12.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -84.85% | -52.02% | -32.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -84.85% | -71.62% | -13.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -65.56% | -14.19% | -51.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.64% | -65.40% | +18.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 58.88% | 26.55% | +32.33% |
Volatility
BTQ.NEO vs. CIFR - Volatility Comparison
BTQ Technologies Corp (BTQ.NEO) has a higher volatility of 43.75% compared to Cipher Mining Inc. (CIFR) at 27.41%. This indicates that BTQ.NEO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CIFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BTQ.NEO | CIFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 43.75% | 27.41% | +16.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 83.57% | 70.20% | +13.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 159.22% | 108.28% | +50.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 169.86% | 121.47% | +48.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 169.86% | 121.47% | +48.39% |
Dividends
BTQ.NEO vs. CIFR - Dividend Comparison
Neither BTQ.NEO nor CIFR has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
BTQ.NEO vs. CIFR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between BTQ Technologies Corp and Cipher Mining Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
BTQ.NEO and CIFR have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for BTQ.NEO and CIFR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer