PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BTOT vs. VDE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BTOT vs. VDE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Total USD Fixed Income Market ETF (BTOT) and Vanguard Energy ETF (VDE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTOT achieves a 0.39% return, which is significantly lower than VDE's 32.24% return.


BTOT

1D
-0.21%
1M
0.29%
YTD
0.39%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VDE

1D
1.13%
1M
-2.17%
YTD
32.24%
6M
29.32%
1Y
45.53%
3Y*
17.97%
5Y*
20.43%
10Y*
9.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BTOT vs. VDE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
BTOT
iShares Total USD Fixed Income Market ETF
0.39%0.31%
VDE
Vanguard Energy ETF
32.24%-2.11%

Correlation

The correlation between BTOT and VDE is -0.35, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2025

-0.35

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BTOT vs. VDE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTOT

VDE
VDE Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
VDE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VDE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
VDE Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
VDE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
VDE Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTOT vs. VDE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Total USD Fixed Income Market ETF (BTOT) and Vanguard Energy ETF (VDE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BTOT vs. VDE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BTOTVDEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.28

+0.13

Drawdowns

BTOT vs. VDE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTOT drawdown since its inception was -2.36%, smaller than the maximum VDE drawdown of -74.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTOT and VDE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BTOTVDEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.36%

-74.20%

+71.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-69.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.18%

-6.43%

+5.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.77%

-19.96%

+19.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.00%

Volatility

BTOT vs. VDE - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BTOTVDEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.70%

20.38%

-16.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.70%

26.40%

-22.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.70%

29.93%

-26.23%

BTOT vs. VDE - Expense Ratio Comparison

BTOT has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than VDE's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BTOT vs. VDE - Dividend Comparison

BTOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%, less than VDE's 2.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BTOT
iShares Total USD Fixed Income Market ETF
2.13%0.22%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VDE
Vanguard Energy ETF
2.37%3.11%3.23%3.34%3.65%4.13%4.76%3.42%3.35%2.90%2.31%3.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


BTOT and VDE have a correlation of -0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BTOT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BTOT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for VDE.

VDE has the higher dividend yield at 2.37%, compared with 2.13% for BTOT.

BTOT is categorized as Total Bond Market, while VDE is Energy Equities. BTOT tracks Bloomberg US Total Fixed Income Market Index, while VDE tracks MSCI US Investable Market Energy 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for BTOT and 0.10% for VDE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BTOT and VDE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer