BTOT vs. VDE
BTOT (iShares Total USD Fixed Income Market ETF) and VDE (Vanguard Energy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BTOT is a Total Bond Market fund tracking the Bloomberg US Total Fixed Income Market Index, while VDE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Energy 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.34, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.09% expense ratio.
Performance
BTOT vs. VDE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BTOT achieves a 0.62% return, which is significantly lower than VDE's 23.55% return.
BTOT
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.66%
- YTD
- 0.62%
- 6M
- 0.75%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VDE
- 1D
- 0.60%
- 1M
- -7.94%
- YTD
- 23.55%
- 6M
- 24.06%
- 1Y
- 31.01%
- 3Y*
- 16.13%
- 5Y*
- 18.74%
- 10Y*
- 8.90%
BTOT vs. VDE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BTOT iShares Total USD Fixed Income Market ETF | 0.62% | 0.12% |
VDE Vanguard Energy ETF | 23.55% | -2.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between BTOT and VDE is -0.34, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025 | -0.34 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BTOT vs. VDE — Risk / Return Rank
BTOT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
VDE
BTOT vs. VDE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Total USD Fixed Income Market ETF (BTOT) and Vanguard Energy ETF (VDE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BTOT | VDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.25 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.19 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.75 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BTOT vs. VDE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTOT drawdown since its inception was -2.36%, smaller than the maximum VDE drawdown of -74.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTOT and VDE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BTOT | VDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.36% | -74.20% | +71.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.20% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -21.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.58% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -69.29% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.96% | -12.59% | +11.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.79% | -19.94% | +19.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.61% | — |
Volatility
BTOT vs. VDE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BTOT | VDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.06% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 16.61% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.70% | 20.80% | -17.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.70% | 26.37% | -22.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.70% | 29.94% | -26.24% |
BTOT vs. VDE - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both BTOT and VDE have an expense ratio of 0.09%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BTOT vs. VDE - Dividend Comparison
BTOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.12%, less than VDE's 2.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BTOT iShares Total USD Fixed Income Market ETF | 2.12% | 0.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VDE Vanguard Energy ETF | 2.54% | 3.11% | 3.23% | 3.34% | 3.65% | 4.13% | 4.76% | 3.42% | 3.35% | 2.90% | 2.31% | 3.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BTOT and VDE have a correlation of -0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.09% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BTOT and VDE have the same expense ratio: 0.09% per year.
VDE has the higher dividend yield at 2.54%, compared with 2.12% for BTOT.
BTOT is categorized as Total Bond Market, while VDE is Energy Equities. BTOT tracks Bloomberg US Total Fixed Income Market Index, while VDE tracks MSCI US Investable Market Energy 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard.
Find the right allocation for BTOT and VDE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer