BTOT vs. IVV
BTOT (iShares Total USD Fixed Income Market ETF) and IVV (iShares Core S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BTOT is a Total Bond Market fund tracking the Bloomberg US Total Fixed Income Market Index, while IVV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BTOT charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for IVV.
Performance
BTOT vs. IVV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BTOT achieves a 0.34% return, which is significantly lower than IVV's 10.84% return.
BTOT
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- -0.35%
- 6M
- 0.12%
- YTD
- 0.34%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IVV
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 1.61%
- 6M
- 8.94%
- YTD
- 10.84%
- 1Y
- 21.73%
- 3Y*
- 20.29%
- 5Y*
- 13.16%
- 10Y*
- 15.17%
BTOT vs. IVV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BTOT iShares Total USD Fixed Income Market ETF | 0.34% | 0.12% |
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 10.84% | -0.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between BTOT and IVV is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025 | 0.47 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BTOT vs. IVV — Risk / Return Rank
BTOT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IVV
BTOT vs. IVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Total USD Fixed Income Market ETF (BTOT) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BTOT | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.32 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.46 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 10.68 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BTOT vs. IVV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTOT drawdown since its inception was -2.36%, smaller than the maximum IVV drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTOT and IVV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BTOT | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.36% | -55.25% | +52.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.89% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.75% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.53% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.90% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.23% | -0.77% | -0.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.80% | -10.74% | +9.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.04% | — |
Volatility
BTOT vs. IVV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BTOT | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.03% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.04% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.67% | 12.58% | -8.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.67% | 17.01% | -13.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.67% | 18.05% | -14.38% |
BTOT vs. IVV - Expense Ratio Comparison
BTOT has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than IVV's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BTOT vs. IVV - Dividend Comparison
BTOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.50%, more than IVV's 1.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BTOT iShares Total USD Fixed Income Market ETF | 2.50% | 0.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 1.08% | 1.17% | 1.30% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.20% | 1.57% | 1.85% | 2.21% | 1.75% | 2.01% | 2.27% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BTOT and IVV have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IVV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IVV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for BTOT.
BTOT has the higher dividend yield at 2.50%, compared with 1.08% for IVV.
BTOT is categorized as Total Bond Market, while IVV is S&P 500. BTOT tracks Bloomberg US Total Fixed Income Market Index, while IVV tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for BTOT and 0.03% for IVV.
Find the right allocation for BTOT and IVV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer