BTO vs. FRBAX

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

BTO (John Hancock Financial Opportunities Fund) and FRBAX (John Hancock Regional Bank Fund) are both Financials Equities funds from John Hancock. Over the past 10 years, BTO returned 12.10%/yr vs 10.99%/yr for FRBAX. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BTO charges 2.01%/yr vs 1.22%/yr for FRBAX.

Performance

BTO vs. FRBAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Financial Opportunities Fund (BTO) and John Hancock Regional Bank Fund (FRBAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with BTO having a 13.64% return and FRBAX slightly higher at 14.08%. Over the past 10 years, BTO has outperformed FRBAX with an annualized return of 12.10%, while FRBAX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.99% annualized return.

BTO

• 1D: 1.02%
• 1M: 6.86%
• YTD: 13.64%
• 6M: 11.11%
• 1Y: 20.96%
• 3Y*: 24.12%
• 5Y*: 8.27%
• 10Y*: 12.10%

FRBAX

• 1D: 1.28%
• 1M: 6.31%
• YTD: 14.08%
• 6M: 11.22%
• 1Y: 28.99%
• 3Y*: 26.79%
• 5Y*: 7.68%
• 10Y*: 10.99%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BTO vs. FRBAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BTO John Hancock Financial Opportunities Fund	13.64%	5.85%	28.92%	-1.16%	-23.58%	61.86%	-8.97%	38.87%	-25.68%	13.12%
FRBAX John Hancock Regional Bank Fund	14.08%	11.07%	22.54%	-1.93%	-12.25%	40.51%	-10.11%	27.60%	-17.61%	10.32%

Correlation

The correlation between BTO and FRBAX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.81
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.72
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 17, 1994	0.76

The correlation between BTO and FRBAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BTO vs. FRBAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTO

BTO Risk / Return Rank: 17
BTO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
BTO Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
BTO Omega Ratio Rank: 17
BTO Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
BTO Martin Ratio Rank: 14

FRBAX

FRBAX Risk / Return Rank: 32
FRBAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
FRBAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
FRBAX Omega Ratio Rank: 32
FRBAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
FRBAX Martin Ratio Rank: 27

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTO vs. FRBAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Financial Opportunities Fund (BTO) and John Hancock Regional Bank Fund (FRBAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BTO	FRBAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.03	1.43	-0.40
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.51	2.02	-0.51
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.26	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.38	2.14	-0.76
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.42	5.68	-2.26

BTO vs. FRBAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BTO Sharpe Ratio is 1.03, which is comparable to the FRBAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTO and FRBAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BTO vs. FRBAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTO drawdown since its inception was -72.27%, which is greater than FRBAX's maximum drawdown of -67.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTO and FRBAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	BTO	FRBAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-72.27%	-67.55%	-4.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.26%	-14.22%	-1.04%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.19%	-25.26%	+0.07%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-51.80%	-46.15%	-5.65%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-65.70%	-52.24%	-13.46%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.97%	-12.27%	-6.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.14%	5.35%	+0.79%

Volatility

BTO vs. FRBAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for John Hancock Financial Opportunities Fund (BTO) is 5.58%, while John Hancock Regional Bank Fund (FRBAX) has a volatility of 5.98%. This indicates that BTO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FRBAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BTO	FRBAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.58%	5.98%	-0.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.20%	14.88%	+0.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.65%	21.50%	-0.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.88%	26.46%	+4.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	36.11%	29.28%	+6.83%

BTO vs. FRBAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BTO has a 2.01% expense ratio, which is higher than FRBAX's 1.22% expense ratio.

Dividends

BTO vs. FRBAX - Dividend Comparison

BTO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.76%, less than FRBAX's 7.32% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BTO John Hancock Financial Opportunities Fund	6.76%	7.41%	7.28%	8.64%	7.51%	4.72%	7.25%	6.06%	5.94%	3.76%	5.10%	4.75%
FRBAX John Hancock Regional Bank Fund	7.32%	8.82%	9.72%	2.65%	5.83%	5.26%	2.43%	1.75%	1.92%	1.76%	2.94%	4.42%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BTO and FRBAX in my portfolio?

BTO and FRBAX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BTO or FRBAX?

FRBAX has higher volatility (5.98%) compared to BTO (5.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTO dropped -72.27% vs FRBAX's -67.55%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FRBAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.