PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BTMKX vs. BRGKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BTMKX vs. BRGKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EAFE International Index Fund (BTMKX) and iShares Russell 1000 Large-Cap Index Fund Class K (BRGKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTMKX achieves a 9.29% return, which is significantly lower than BRGKX's 11.19% return. Over the past 10 years, BTMKX has underperformed BRGKX with an annualized return of 9.38%, while BRGKX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.20% annualized return.


BTMKX

1D
-0.28%
1M
2.62%
YTD
9.29%
6M
12.25%
1Y
21.09%
3Y*
17.08%
5Y*
8.76%
10Y*
9.38%

BRGKX

1D
0.28%
1M
5.11%
YTD
11.19%
6M
11.51%
1Y
28.65%
3Y*
22.34%
5Y*
13.30%
10Y*
15.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BTMKX vs. BRGKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BTMKX
iShares MSCI EAFE International Index Fund
9.29%31.70%3.70%18.37%-14.04%11.30%8.07%21.96%-13.38%25.17%
BRGKX
iShares Russell 1000 Large-Cap Index Fund Class K
11.19%17.28%24.44%26.49%-19.13%26.24%20.85%31.30%-4.86%21.18%

Correlation

The correlation between BTMKX and BRGKX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2011

0.79

The correlation between BTMKX and BRGKX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BTMKX vs. BRGKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTMKX
BTMKX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
BTMKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTMKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTMKX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
BTMKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTMKX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

BRGKX
BRGKX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
BRGKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRGKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRGKX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
BRGKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRGKX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTMKX vs. BRGKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EAFE International Index Fund (BTMKX) and iShares Russell 1000 Large-Cap Index Fund Class K (BRGKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BTMKXBRGKXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.49

2.45

-0.96

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.13

3.33

-1.20

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.44

-0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.01

3.29

-1.28

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.54

15.26

-7.72

BTMKX vs. BRGKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BTMKX Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is lower than the BRGKX Sharpe Ratio of 2.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTMKX and BRGKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BTMKXBRGKXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.49

2.45

-0.96

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.78

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

0.84

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.79

-0.40

Drawdowns

BTMKX vs. BRGKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTMKX drawdown since its inception was -33.92%, roughly equal to the maximum BRGKX drawdown of -34.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTMKX and BRGKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BTMKXBRGKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.92%

-34.58%

+0.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.30%

-8.85%

-2.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.66%

-19.15%

+5.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.23%

-25.13%

-4.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.92%

-34.58%

+0.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.70%

0.00%

-0.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.77%

-4.05%

-3.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.01%

1.91%

+1.10%

Volatility

BTMKX vs. BRGKX - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI EAFE International Index Fund (BTMKX) has a higher volatility of 4.73% compared to iShares Russell 1000 Large-Cap Index Fund Class K (BRGKX) at 2.84%. This indicates that BTMKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BRGKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BTMKXBRGKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.73%

2.84%

+1.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.29%

9.04%

+3.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.17%

11.99%

+3.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.17%

17.18%

-1.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.67%

18.22%

-1.55%

BTMKX vs. BRGKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BTMKX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than BRGKX's 0.06% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BTMKX vs. BRGKX - Dividend Comparison

BTMKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.43%, more than BRGKX's 2.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BRGKX
iShares Russell 1000 Large-Cap Index Fund Class K
2.50%2.77%1.38%1.49%1.82%1.88%1.51%2.82%2.46%2.31%3.94%4.86%
BTMKX
iShares MSCI EAFE International Index Fund
3.43%3.74%3.43%3.19%2.80%3.06%1.99%3.34%4.58%2.45%2.85%2.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


BTMKX and BRGKX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BTMKX has higher volatility (4.73%) compared to BRGKX (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTMKX dropped -33.92% vs BRGKX's -34.58%.

BRGKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BTMKX and BRGKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer