PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BRGKX vs. BKIPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BRGKX vs. BKIPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Russell 1000 Large-Cap Index Fund Class K (BRGKX) and iShares Short-Term TIPS Bond Index Fund Class K (BKIPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BRGKX achieves a 9.55% return, which is significantly higher than BKIPX's 0.64% return.


BRGKX

1D
-0.38%
1M
0.28%
YTD
9.55%
6M
8.48%
1Y
24.74%
3Y*
21.13%
5Y*
12.72%
10Y*
15.38%

BKIPX

1D
-0.21%
1M
0.01%
YTD
0.64%
6M
1.01%
1Y
3.22%
3Y*
4.68%
5Y*
2.69%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BRGKX vs. BKIPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BRGKX
iShares Russell 1000 Large-Cap Index Fund Class K
9.55%17.28%24.44%26.49%-19.13%26.24%20.85%31.30%-4.86%21.18%
BKIPX
iShares Short-Term TIPS Bond Index Fund Class K
0.64%6.08%4.77%3.37%-4.18%5.21%4.86%4.90%0.61%0.90%

Correlation

The correlation between BRGKX and BKIPX is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017

0.07

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BRGKX vs. BKIPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BRGKX
BRGKX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
BRGKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRGKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRGKX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
BRGKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRGKX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

BKIPX
BKIPX Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
BKIPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKIPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKIPX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
BKIPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKIPX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BRGKX vs. BKIPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 1000 Large-Cap Index Fund Class K (BRGKX) and iShares Short-Term TIPS Bond Index Fund Class K (BKIPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BRGKXBKIPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.33

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.94

2.42

+0.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.17

9.92

+3.26

BRGKX vs. BKIPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BRGKX Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is higher than the BKIPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BRGKX and BKIPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BRGKX vs. BKIPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BRGKX drawdown since its inception was -34.58%, which is greater than BKIPX's maximum drawdown of -6.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRGKX and BKIPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BRGKXBKIPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.58%

-6.42%

-28.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.85%

-1.34%

-7.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.15%

-1.34%

-17.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.13%

-6.42%

-18.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.67%

-1.34%

-0.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.04%

-1.06%

-2.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.97%

0.33%

+1.64%

Volatility

BRGKX vs. BKIPX - Volatility Comparison

iShares Russell 1000 Large-Cap Index Fund Class K (BRGKX) has a higher volatility of 4.68% compared to iShares Short-Term TIPS Bond Index Fund Class K (BKIPX) at 1.31%. This indicates that BRGKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BKIPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BRGKXBKIPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.68%

1.31%

+3.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.88%

1.82%

+8.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.59%

2.34%

+10.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.27%

3.12%

+14.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.27%

2.64%

+15.63%

BRGKX vs. BKIPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BRGKX and BKIPX have an expense ratio of 0.06%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BRGKX vs. BKIPX - Dividend Comparison

BRGKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, less than BKIPX's 4.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BKIPX
iShares Short-Term TIPS Bond Index Fund Class K
4.69%4.68%4.33%2.77%4.80%4.41%1.17%2.54%2.56%1.90%0.00%0.00%
BRGKX
iShares Russell 1000 Large-Cap Index Fund Class K
2.54%2.77%1.38%1.49%1.82%1.88%1.51%2.82%2.46%2.31%3.94%4.86%

Frequently Asked Questions


BRGKX and BKIPX have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BRGKX has higher volatility (4.68%) compared to BKIPX (1.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BRGKX dropped -34.58% vs BKIPX's -6.42%.

BRGKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BRGKX and BKIPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer