PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BTLSX vs. IVFIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BTLSX vs. IVFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Baillie Gifford International Concentrated Growth Equities Fund (BTLSX) and Federated Hermes International Strategic Value Dividend Fund (IVFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTLSX achieves a -7.50% return, which is significantly lower than IVFIX's 6.24% return.


BTLSX

1D
0.00%
1M
-2.51%
YTD
-7.50%
6M
-7.50%
1Y
-8.44%
3Y*
8.52%
5Y*
-2.46%
10Y*

IVFIX

1D
0.42%
1M
-0.70%
YTD
6.24%
6M
8.36%
1Y
16.08%
3Y*
14.05%
5Y*
9.14%
10Y*
6.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BTLSX vs. IVFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BTLSX
Baillie Gifford International Concentrated Growth Equities Fund
-7.50%16.56%18.34%14.75%-39.64%0.71%100.15%45.32%-13.23%-0.69%
IVFIX
Federated Hermes International Strategic Value Dividend Fund
6.24%31.79%1.91%11.05%-2.54%11.58%-1.74%20.15%-11.96%0.91%

Correlation

The correlation between BTLSX and IVFIX is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2017

0.48

Over the past year, the correlation between BTLSX and IVFIX has dropped to 0.24 - well below their long-term average of 0.48, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BTLSX vs. IVFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTLSX
BTLSX Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
BTLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
BTLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

IVFIX
IVFIX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
IVFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
IVFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTLSX vs. IVFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baillie Gifford International Concentrated Growth Equities Fund (BTLSX) and Federated Hermes International Strategic Value Dividend Fund (IVFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BTLSXIVFIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.94

1.29

-0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.40

2.71

-3.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.93

7.31

-8.24

BTLSX vs. IVFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BTLSX Sharpe Ratio is -0.44, which is lower than the IVFIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTLSX and IVFIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BTLSXIVFIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.44

1.57

-2.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.09

0.73

-0.82

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.21

+0.14

Drawdowns

BTLSX vs. IVFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTLSX drawdown since its inception was -56.26%, which is greater than IVFIX's maximum drawdown of -51.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTLSX and IVFIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BTLSXIVFIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.26%

-51.49%

-4.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.66%

-6.97%

-14.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.32%

-10.75%

-14.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.86%

-21.29%

-34.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.08%

-5.67%

-18.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.64%

-11.62%

-9.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.30%

2.59%

+6.71%

Volatility

BTLSX vs. IVFIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Baillie Gifford International Concentrated Growth Equities Fund (BTLSX) is 4.05%, while Federated Hermes International Strategic Value Dividend Fund (IVFIX) has a volatility of 4.83%. This indicates that BTLSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IVFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BTLSXIVFIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.05%

4.83%

-0.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.72%

9.35%

+6.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.04%

12.10%

+7.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.13%

13.13%

+16.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.39%

14.78%

+13.61%

BTLSX vs. IVFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BTLSX has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is lower than IVFIX's 0.86% expense ratio.


Dividends

BTLSX vs. IVFIX - Dividend Comparison

BTLSX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IVFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.58%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BTLSX
Baillie Gifford International Concentrated Growth Equities Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%6.18%25.27%102.72%0.17%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IVFIX
Federated Hermes International Strategic Value Dividend Fund
3.58%3.37%4.44%4.01%3.99%3.67%3.62%3.98%4.97%4.17%3.38%3.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


BTLSX and IVFIX have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IVFIX has higher volatility (4.83%) compared to BTLSX (4.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTLSX dropped -56.26% vs IVFIX's -51.49%.

IVFIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs -0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BTLSX and IVFIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer