PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BTLSX vs. BGELX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BTLSX vs. BGELX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Baillie Gifford International Concentrated Growth Equities Fund (BTLSX) and Baillie Gifford Emerging Markets Equities Fund (BGELX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


BTLSX

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

BGELX

1D
1.10%
1M
8.59%
6M
12.23%
YTD
25.68%
1Y
49.55%
3Y*
23.67%
5Y*
7.72%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00

BTLSX vs. BGELX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BTLSX
Baillie Gifford International Concentrated Growth Equities Fund
-7.50%16.56%18.34%14.75%-39.64%0.71%100.15%45.32%-13.23%-0.69%
BGELX
Baillie Gifford Emerging Markets Equities Fund
25.68%40.75%6.04%14.42%-26.46%-8.93%29.66%28.10%-14.87%1.65%

Correlation

The correlation between BTLSX and BGELX is 0.67, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2017

0.75

The correlation between BTLSX and BGELX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BTLSX vs. BGELX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BTLSX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


BGELX
BGELX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
BGELX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BGELX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
BGELX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
BGELX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
BGELX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BTLSX vs. BGELX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baillie Gifford International Concentrated Growth Equities Fund (BTLSX) and Baillie Gifford Emerging Markets Equities Fund (BGELX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BTLSXBGELXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.73

BTLSX vs. BGELX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BTLSX vs. BGELX - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BTLSXBGELXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.92%

Volatility

BTLSX vs. BGELX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BTLSXBGELXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.91%

BTLSX vs. BGELX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BTLSX has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is higher than BGELX's 0.76% expense ratio.


Dividends

BTLSX vs. BGELX - Dividend Comparison

BTLSX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BGELX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
BGELX
Baillie Gifford Emerging Markets Equities Fund
1.34%1.68%3.52%4.02%5.46%3.08%1.31%3.90%10.14%1.16%
BTLSX
Baillie Gifford International Concentrated Growth Equities Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%6.18%25.27%102.72%0.17%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BTLSX and BGELX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BTLSX and BGELX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer