BTGD vs. SBIT
BTGD (STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF) and SBIT (Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. BTGD is actively managed, while SBIT is passively managed. Over the past year, BTGD returned -30.17% vs 68.00% for SBIT. At a correlation of -0.90, they often move in opposite directions. BTGD charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for SBIT.
Performance
BTGD vs. SBIT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BTGD achieves a -28.65% return, which is significantly lower than SBIT's 37.02% return.
BTGD
- 1D
- -4.01%
- 1M
- -20.36%
- YTD
- -28.65%
- 6M
- -31.64%
- 1Y
- -30.17%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SBIT
- 1D
- 5.42%
- 1M
- 46.58%
- YTD
- 37.02%
- 6M
- 52.37%
- 1Y
- 68.00%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BTGD vs. SBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
BTGD STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF | -28.65% | 34.62% | 29.81% |
SBIT Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF | 37.02% | -25.11% | -56.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between BTGD and SBIT is -0.88, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2024 | -0.90 |
The correlation between BTGD and SBIT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.90 to -0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BTGD vs. SBIT — Risk / Return Rank
BTGD
SBIT
BTGD vs. SBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF (BTGD) and Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BTGD | SBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.18 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.63 | 1.43 | -2.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.25 | 2.76 | -4.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BTGD | SBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.55 | 0.78 | -1.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | -0.46 | +0.73 |
Drawdowns
BTGD vs. SBIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTGD drawdown since its inception was -47.73%, smaller than the maximum SBIT drawdown of -91.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTGD and SBIT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BTGD | SBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.73% | -91.35% | +43.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -47.73% | -47.94% | +0.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -47.73% | -78.26% | +30.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.58% | -68.55% | +53.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.09% | 24.69% | -0.60% |
Volatility
BTGD vs. SBIT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF (BTGD) is 11.95%, while Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT) has a volatility of 18.22%. This indicates that BTGD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BTGD | SBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.95% | 18.22% | -6.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.64% | 68.46% | -22.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 55.04% | 87.18% | -32.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 55.51% | 97.47% | -41.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 55.51% | 97.47% | -41.96% |
BTGD vs. SBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison
BTGD has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than SBIT's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
BTGD vs. SBIT - Dividend Comparison
BTGD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.71%, more than SBIT's 3.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BTGD STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF | 4.71% | 3.36% | 0.19% |
SBIT Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF | 3.42% | 0.52% | 1.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BTGD and SBIT have a correlation of -0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SBIT has higher volatility (18.22%) compared to BTGD (11.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTGD dropped -47.73% vs SBIT's -91.35%.
On 1-year performance, SBIT leads with 68.00% vs -30.17% for BTGD. On fees, SBIT is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, BTGD has been the lower-risk option at 11.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SBIT has performed better with a 68.00% return vs -30.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SBIT is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for BTGD.
BTGD has the higher dividend yield at 4.71%, compared with 3.42% for SBIT.
They also come from different issuers: Quantify Funds and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for BTGD and 0.95% for SBIT.
SBIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.78 vs -0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BTGD and SBIT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer