BTGD vs. OUNZ
BTGD (STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF) and OUNZ (VanEck Merk Gold Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - BTGD is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Quantify Funds, while OUNZ is a Precious Metals fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM ($/ozt). BTGD is actively managed, while OUNZ is passively managed. Over the past year, BTGD returned -31.91% vs 30.33% for OUNZ. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BTGD charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for OUNZ.
Performance
BTGD vs. OUNZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BTGD achieves a -32.80% return, which is significantly lower than OUNZ's 0.29% return.
BTGD
- 1D
- 5.44%
- 1M
- -28.40%
- YTD
- -32.80%
- 6M
- -33.78%
- 1Y
- -31.91%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OUNZ
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -8.43%
- YTD
- 0.29%
- 6M
- 3.12%
- 1Y
- 30.33%
- 3Y*
- 29.90%
- 5Y*
- 17.72%
- 10Y*
- 12.64%
BTGD vs. OUNZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
BTGD STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF | -32.80% | 34.62% | 29.81% |
OUNZ VanEck Merk Gold Trust | 0.29% | 63.95% | -2.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between BTGD and OUNZ is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2024 | 0.50 |
The correlation between BTGD and OUNZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BTGD vs. OUNZ — Risk / Return Rank
BTGD
OUNZ
BTGD vs. OUNZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF (BTGD) and VanEck Merk Gold Trust (OUNZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BTGD | OUNZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.23 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.60 | 1.52 | -2.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.29 | 3.82 | -5.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BTGD | OUNZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.57 | 1.14 | -1.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.99 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.79 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.19 | 0.64 | -0.46 |
Drawdowns
BTGD vs. OUNZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTGD drawdown since its inception was -53.31%, which is greater than OUNZ's maximum drawdown of -21.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTGD and OUNZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BTGD | OUNZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.31% | -21.77% | -31.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -53.31% | -20.00% | -33.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -20.00% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.01% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -21.76% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.77% | -19.83% | -30.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.85% | -7.58% | -7.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.72% | 7.96% | +16.76% |
Volatility
BTGD vs. OUNZ - Volatility Comparison
STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF (BTGD) has a higher volatility of 14.85% compared to VanEck Merk Gold Trust (OUNZ) at 5.67%. This indicates that BTGD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OUNZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BTGD | OUNZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.85% | 5.67% | +9.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 46.45% | 23.29% | +23.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 56.04% | 26.66% | +29.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 55.94% | 17.99% | +37.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 55.94% | 16.00% | +39.94% |
BTGD vs. OUNZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
BTGD has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than OUNZ's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
BTGD vs. OUNZ - Dividend Comparison
BTGD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.00%, while OUNZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BTGD STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF | 5.00% | 3.36% | 0.19% |
OUNZ VanEck Merk Gold Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BTGD and OUNZ have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BTGD has higher volatility (14.85%) compared to OUNZ (5.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTGD dropped -53.31% vs OUNZ's -21.77%.
On 1-year performance, OUNZ leads with 30.33% vs -31.91% for BTGD. On fees, OUNZ is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, OUNZ has been the lower-risk option at 5.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, OUNZ has performed better with a 30.33% return vs -31.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
OUNZ is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for BTGD.
BTGD has the higher dividend yield at 5.00%, compared with 0.00% for OUNZ.
BTGD is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while OUNZ is Precious Metals. They also come from different issuers: Quantify Funds and Merk. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for BTGD and 0.25% for OUNZ.
OUNZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.14 vs -0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BTGD and OUNZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer