BTGD vs. EZBC

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

BTGD (STKd 100% Bitcoin & 100% Gold ETF) and EZBC (Franklin Bitcoin ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. BTGD is actively managed, while EZBC is passively managed. Over the past year, BTGD returned -43.38% vs -44.16% for EZBC. Their correlation of 0.90 means they have usually moved in the same direction. BTGD charges 1.05%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for EZBC.

Performance

BTGD vs. EZBC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in STKd 100% Bitcoin & 100% Gold ETF (BTGD) and Franklin Bitcoin ETF (EZBC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTGD achieves a -38.50% return, which is significantly lower than EZBC's -26.66% return.

BTGD

• 1D: 1.37%
• 1M: 1.91%
• 6M: -37.24%
• YTD: -38.50%
• 1Y: -43.38%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 3.87%

EZBC

• 1D: 0.60%
• 1M: 4.48%
• 6M: -16.02%
• YTD: -26.66%
• 1Y: -44.16%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 10.35%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BTGD STKd 100% Bitcoin & 100% Gold ETF	$428.43K	$383.52K	$1.03M
EZBC Franklin Bitcoin ETF	$3.99M	$4.09M	$6.89M

BTGD vs. EZBC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
BTGD STKd 100% Bitcoin & 100% Gold ETF	-38.50%	34.62%	29.32%
EZBC Franklin Bitcoin ETF	-26.66%	-6.56%	39.31%

Correlation

The correlation between BTGD and EZBC is 0.89, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2024	0.90

The correlation between BTGD and EZBC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BTGD vs. EZBC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BTGD

BTGD Risk / Return Rank: 3
BTGD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
BTGD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
BTGD Omega Ratio Rank: 3
BTGD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
BTGD Martin Ratio Rank: 2

EZBC

EZBC Risk / Return Rank: 2
EZBC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
EZBC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
EZBC Omega Ratio Rank: 2
EZBC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
EZBC Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BTGD vs. EZBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for STKd 100% Bitcoin & 100% Gold ETF (BTGD) and Franklin Bitcoin ETF (EZBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BTGD	EZBC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.75	-1.00	+0.25
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.92	-1.47	+0.55
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.89	0.84	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.74	-0.83	+0.09
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.33	-1.27	-0.06

BTGD vs. EZBC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BTGD Sharpe Ratio is -0.75, which is comparable to the EZBC Sharpe Ratio of -1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTGD and EZBC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BTGD vs. EZBC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTGD drawdown since its inception was -58.79%, which is greater than EZBC's maximum drawdown of -53.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTGD and EZBC.

Drawdown Indicators

	BTGD	EZBC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.79%	-53.35%	-5.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-58.79%	-53.35%	-5.44%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-54.95%	-48.95%	-6.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.27%	-18.38%	+0.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	32.74%	34.92%	-2.18%

Volatility

BTGD vs. EZBC - Volatility Comparison

STKd 100% Bitcoin & 100% Gold ETF (BTGD) has a higher volatility of 12.81% compared to Franklin Bitcoin ETF (EZBC) at 8.09%. This indicates that BTGD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EZBC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BTGD	EZBC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.81%	8.09%	+4.72%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	44.87%	33.06%	+11.81%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	58.20%	44.31%	+13.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	55.65%	49.45%	+6.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	55.65%	49.45%	+6.20%

BTGD vs. EZBC - Expense Ratio Comparison

BTGD has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than EZBC's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

BTGD vs. EZBC - Dividend Comparison

BTGD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.47%, while EZBC has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BTGD STKd 100% Bitcoin & 100% Gold ETF	5.47%	3.36%	0.19%
EZBC Franklin Bitcoin ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BTGD and EZBC in my portfolio?

BTGD and EZBC have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BTGD or EZBC?

BTGD has higher volatility (12.81%) compared to EZBC (8.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTGD dropped -58.79% vs EZBC's -53.35%.

Which ETF is better, BTGD or EZBC?

On 1-year performance, BTGD leads with -43.38% vs -44.16% for EZBC. On fees, EZBC is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, EZBC has been the lower-risk option at 8.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BTGD or EZBC?

Over the 1-year period, BTGD has performed better with a -43.38% return vs -44.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BTGD or EZBC?

EZBC is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for BTGD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BTGD or EZBC?

BTGD has the higher dividend yield at 5.47%, compared with 0.00% for EZBC.

What is the main difference between BTGD and EZBC?

They also come from different issuers: Quantify Funds and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for BTGD and 0.19% for EZBC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BTGD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.75 vs -1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.