BTGD vs. CSHP

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BTGD (STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF) and CSHP (iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BTGD is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Quantify Funds, while CSHP is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by iShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BTGD returned -30.17% vs 3.96% for CSHP. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BTGD charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for CSHP.

Performance

BTGD vs. CSHP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF (BTGD) and iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTGD achieves a -28.65% return, which is significantly lower than CSHP's 1.63% return.

BTGD

• 1D: -4.01%
• 1M: -20.36%
• YTD: -28.65%
• 6M: -31.64%
• 1Y: -30.17%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CSHP

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.27%
• YTD: 1.63%
• 6M: 1.93%
• 1Y: 3.96%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BTGD vs. CSHP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
BTGD STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF	-28.65%	34.62%	29.81%
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF	1.63%	4.10%	0.99%

Correlation

The correlation between BTGD and CSHP is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2024	0.02

The correlation between BTGD and CSHP shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.02 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

BTGD vs. CSHP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTGD

BTGD Risk / Return Rank: 4
BTGD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
BTGD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
BTGD Omega Ratio Rank: 4
BTGD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
BTGD Martin Ratio Rank: 3

CSHP

CSHP Risk / Return Rank: 100
CSHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
CSHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
CSHP Omega Ratio Rank: 100
CSHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
CSHP Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTGD vs. CSHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF (BTGD) and iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BTGD	CSHP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.55	11.91	-12.46
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.51	31.26	-31.77
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.94	7.44	-6.50
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.63	65.71	-66.34
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.25	432.16	-433.41
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BTGD vs. CSHP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BTGD Sharpe Ratio is -0.55, which is lower than the CSHP Sharpe Ratio of 11.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTGD and CSHP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BTGD	CSHP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.55	11.91	-12.46
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.26	10.75	-10.49

Drawdowns

BTGD vs. CSHP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTGD drawdown since its inception was -47.73%, which is greater than CSHP's maximum drawdown of -0.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTGD and CSHP.

Drawdown Indicators

	BTGD	CSHP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-47.73%	-0.08%	-47.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-47.73%	-0.06%	-47.67%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-47.73%	0.00%	-47.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.58%	-0.00%	-14.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	24.09%	0.01%	+24.08%

Volatility

BTGD vs. CSHP - Volatility Comparison

STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF (BTGD) has a higher volatility of 11.95% compared to iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP) at 0.07%. This indicates that BTGD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BTGD	CSHP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.95%	0.07%	+11.88%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	45.64%	0.24%	+45.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	55.04%	0.33%	+54.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	55.51%	0.40%	+55.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	55.51%	0.40%	+55.11%

BTGD vs. CSHP - Expense Ratio Comparison

BTGD has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than CSHP's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

BTGD vs. CSHP - Dividend Comparison

BTGD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.71%, more than CSHP's 3.92% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BTGD STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF	4.71%	3.36%	0.19%
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF	3.92%	5.39%	1.96%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BTGD and CSHP in my portfolio?

BTGD and CSHP have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BTGD or CSHP?

BTGD has higher volatility (11.95%) compared to CSHP (0.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTGD dropped -47.73% vs CSHP's -0.08%.

Which ETF is better, BTGD or CSHP?

On 1-year performance, CSHP leads with 3.96% vs -30.17% for BTGD. On fees, CSHP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, CSHP has been the lower-risk option at 0.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BTGD or CSHP?

Over the 1-year period, CSHP has performed better with a 3.96% return vs -30.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BTGD or CSHP?

CSHP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for BTGD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BTGD or CSHP?

BTGD has the higher dividend yield at 4.71%, compared with 3.92% for CSHP.

What is the main difference between BTGD and CSHP?

BTGD is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while CSHP is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Quantify Funds and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for BTGD and 0.20% for CSHP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CSHP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (11.91 vs -0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.