BTGD vs. CBOO
BTGD (STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF) and CBOO (Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - October) are both exchange-traded funds - BTGD is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Quantify Funds, while CBOO is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Calamos. Both are actively managed. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BTGD charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for CBOO.
Performance
BTGD vs. CBOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BTGD achieves a -28.65% return, which is significantly lower than CBOO's -0.04% return.
BTGD
- 1D
- -4.01%
- 1M
- -20.36%
- YTD
- -28.65%
- 6M
- -31.64%
- 1Y
- -30.17%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CBOO
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- -0.00%
- YTD
- -0.04%
- 6M
- -0.22%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BTGD vs. CBOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BTGD STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF | -28.65% | -24.68% |
CBOO Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - October | -0.04% | -1.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between BTGD and CBOO is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2025 | 0.63 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BTGD vs. CBOO — Risk / Return Rank
BTGD
CBOO
BTGD vs. CBOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF (BTGD) and Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - October (CBOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BTGD | CBOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.63 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.25 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BTGD | CBOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.55 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | -1.19 | +1.45 |
Drawdowns
BTGD vs. CBOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTGD drawdown since its inception was -47.73%, which is greater than CBOO's maximum drawdown of -2.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTGD and CBOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BTGD | CBOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.73% | -2.34% | -45.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -47.73% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -47.73% | -1.72% | -46.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.58% | -1.61% | -12.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.09% | — | — |
Volatility
BTGD vs. CBOO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BTGD | CBOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.95% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.64% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 55.04% | 2.14% | +52.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 55.51% | 2.14% | +53.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 55.51% | 2.14% | +53.37% |
BTGD vs. CBOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
BTGD has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than CBOO's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
BTGD vs. CBOO - Dividend Comparison
BTGD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.71%, more than CBOO's 0.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BTGD STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF | 4.71% | 3.36% | 0.19% |
CBOO Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - October | 0.57% | 0.57% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BTGD and CBOO have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CBOO is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CBOO is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for BTGD.
BTGD has the higher dividend yield at 4.71%, compared with 0.57% for CBOO.
BTGD is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while CBOO is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Quantify Funds and Calamos. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for BTGD and 0.69% for CBOO.
Find the right allocation for BTGD and CBOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer