BTFAX vs. APFPX
BTFAX (BTS Tactical Fixed Income Fund) and APFPX (Artisan Global Unconstrained Fund) are both Nontraditional Bonds funds. Over the past 3 years, BTFAX returned 2.84%/yr vs 9.48%/yr for APFPX. At a correlation of -0.25, they often move in opposite directions. BTFAX charges 1.65%/yr vs 1.54%/yr for APFPX.
Performance
BTFAX vs. APFPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BTFAX achieves a -1.05% return, which is significantly lower than APFPX's 4.00% return.
BTFAX
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- -1.05%
- 6M
- -0.78%
- 1Y
- 2.82%
- 3Y*
- 2.84%
- 5Y*
- -1.73%
- 10Y*
- -0.48%
APFPX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.07%
- YTD
- 4.00%
- 6M
- 5.16%
- 1Y
- 12.02%
- 3Y*
- 9.48%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BTFAX vs. APFPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BTFAX BTS Tactical Fixed Income Fund | -1.05% | 2.96% | 3.52% | 2.12% | -6.05% |
APFPX Artisan Global Unconstrained Fund | 4.00% | 10.21% | 11.33% | 6.67% | 6.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between BTFAX and APFPX is -0.24, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2022 | -0.25 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BTFAX vs. APFPX — Risk / Return Rank
BTFAX
APFPX
BTFAX vs. APFPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BTS Tactical Fixed Income Fund (BTFAX) and Artisan Global Unconstrained Fund (APFPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BTFAX | APFPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -6.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 2.25 | -1.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.04 | 13.50 | -12.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.55 | 61.50 | -58.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BTFAX | APFPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 | 4.91 | -4.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.32 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.10 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.10 | 3.54 | -3.44 |
Drawdowns
BTFAX vs. APFPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTFAX drawdown since its inception was -19.78%, which is greater than APFPX's maximum drawdown of -2.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTFAX and APFPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BTFAX | APFPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.78% | -2.10% | -17.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.84% | -0.90% | -1.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.89% | -2.02% | -2.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.49% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.78% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.85% | -0.33% | -10.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.27% | -0.25% | -6.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.16% | 0.20% | +0.96% |
Volatility
BTFAX vs. APFPX - Volatility Comparison
BTS Tactical Fixed Income Fund (BTFAX) has a higher volatility of 0.68% compared to Artisan Global Unconstrained Fund (APFPX) at 0.48%. This indicates that BTFAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than APFPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BTFAX | APFPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.68% | 0.48% | +0.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.32% | 2.09% | +0.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.64% | 2.47% | +1.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.46% | 2.76% | +2.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.91% | 2.76% | +2.15% |
BTFAX vs. APFPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BTFAX has a 1.65% expense ratio, which is higher than APFPX's 1.54% expense ratio.
Dividends
BTFAX vs. APFPX - Dividend Comparison
BTFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.32%, less than APFPX's 4.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APFPX Artisan Global Unconstrained Fund | 4.59% | 4.01% | 6.18% | 6.89% | 8.60% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BTFAX BTS Tactical Fixed Income Fund | 4.32% | 4.39% | 2.71% | 3.52% | 2.11% | 1.69% | 0.68% | 3.17% | 3.38% | 2.67% | 4.89% | 0.87% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BTFAX and APFPX have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BTFAX has higher volatility (0.68%) compared to APFPX (0.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTFAX dropped -19.78% vs APFPX's -2.10%.
APFPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.91 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BTFAX and APFPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer