BTFAX vs. BITO
BTFAX (BTS Tactical Fixed Income Fund) and BITO (ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF) are both funds - BTFAX is a Nontraditional Bonds fund managed by BTS, while BITO is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by ProShares. Over the past 3 years, BTFAX returned 2.79%/yr vs 26.52%/yr for BITO. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BTFAX charges 1.65%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BITO.
Performance
BTFAX vs. BITO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BTFAX achieves a -1.18% return, which is significantly higher than BITO's -24.14% return.
BTFAX
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- -0.00%
- YTD
- -1.18%
- 6M
- -0.79%
- 1Y
- 2.82%
- 3Y*
- 2.79%
- 5Y*
- -1.78%
- 10Y*
- -0.50%
BITO
- 1D
- -5.85%
- 1M
- -14.50%
- YTD
- -24.14%
- 6M
- -27.28%
- 1Y
- -38.17%
- 3Y*
- 26.52%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BTFAX vs. BITO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BTFAX BTS Tactical Fixed Income Fund | -1.18% | 2.96% | 3.52% | 2.12% | -12.82% | -1.15% |
BITO ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF | -24.14% | -11.19% | 104.45% | 137.33% | -63.91% | -31.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between BTFAX and BITO is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2021 | 0.23 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BTFAX vs. BITO — Risk / Return Rank
BTFAX
BITO
BTFAX vs. BITO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BTS Tactical Fixed Income Fund (BTFAX) and ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BTFAX | BITO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.78 | -0.88 | +1.66 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.10 | -1.21 | +2.31 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 0.86 | +0.28 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.04 | -0.77 | +1.81 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.56 | -1.33 | +3.88 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BTFAX | BITO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 | -0.88 | +1.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.33 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.10 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.10 | -0.08 | +0.18 |
Drawdowns
BTFAX vs. BITO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTFAX drawdown since its inception was -19.78%, smaller than the maximum BITO drawdown of -77.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTFAX and BITO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BTFAX | BITO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.78% | -77.86% | +58.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.84% | -50.05% | +47.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.89% | -50.05% | +45.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.49% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.78% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.97% | -47.68% | +36.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.27% | -36.72% | +30.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.15% | 28.93% | -27.78% |
Volatility
BTFAX vs. BITO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BTS Tactical Fixed Income Fund (BTFAX) is 0.67%, while ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO) has a volatility of 9.61%. This indicates that BTFAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BITO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BTFAX | BITO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.67% | 9.61% | -8.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.32% | 34.65% | -32.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.64% | 43.48% | -39.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.46% | 55.12% | -49.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.91% | 55.12% | -50.21% |
BTFAX vs. BITO - Expense Ratio Comparison
BTFAX has a 1.65% expense ratio, which is higher than BITO's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
BTFAX vs. BITO - Dividend Comparison
BTFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.32%, less than BITO's 65.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BITO ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF | 65.64% | 78.29% | 61.59% | 15.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BTFAX BTS Tactical Fixed Income Fund | 4.32% | 4.39% | 2.71% | 3.52% | 2.11% | 1.69% | 0.68% | 3.17% | 3.38% | 2.67% | 4.89% | 0.87% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BTFAX and BITO have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BITO has higher volatility (9.61%) compared to BTFAX (0.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTFAX dropped -19.78% vs BITO's -77.86%.
BTFAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.78 vs -0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BTFAX and BITO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer