BTFAX vs. BITO
BTFAX (BTS Tactical Fixed Income Fund) and BITO (ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF) are both funds - BTFAX is a Nontraditional Bonds fund managed by BTS, while BITO is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by ProShares. Over the past 3 years, BTFAX returned 2.74%/yr vs 19.35%/yr for BITO. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BTFAX charges 1.65%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BITO.
Performance
BTFAX vs. BITO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BTFAX achieves a -1.01% return, which is significantly higher than BITO's -30.09% return.
BTFAX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.04%
- 6M
- -1.53%
- YTD
- -1.01%
- 1Y
- 1.53%
- 3Y*
- 2.74%
- 5Y*
- -1.95%
- 10Y*
- -0.43%
BITO
- 1D
- -2.65%
- 1M
- -2.30%
- 6M
- -33.01%
- YTD
- -30.09%
- 1Y
- -49.36%
- 3Y*
- 19.35%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BTFAX vs. BITO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BTFAX BTS Tactical Fixed Income Fund | -1.01% | 2.96% | 3.52% | 2.12% | -12.82% | -0.94% |
BITO ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF | -30.09% | -11.19% | 104.45% | 137.33% | -63.91% | -29.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between BTFAX and BITO is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2021 | 0.23 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BTFAX vs. BITO — Risk / Return Rank
BTFAX
BITO
BTFAX vs. BITO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BTS Tactical Fixed Income Fund (BTFAX) and ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BTFAX | BITO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 0.81 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.45 | -0.91 | +1.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.95 | -1.48 | +2.43 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BTFAX vs. BITO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTFAX drawdown since its inception was -19.78%, smaller than the maximum BITO drawdown of -77.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTFAX and BITO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BTFAX | BITO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.78% | -77.86% | +58.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.84% | -54.47% | +51.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.89% | -54.47% | +49.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.32% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.78% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.82% | -51.78% | +40.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.30% | -37.03% | +30.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.34% | 33.47% | -32.13% |
Volatility
BTFAX vs. BITO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BTS Tactical Fixed Income Fund (BTFAX) is 0.49%, while ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO) has a volatility of 11.12%. This indicates that BTFAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BITO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BTFAX | BITO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.49% | 11.12% | -10.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.26% | 34.48% | -32.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.50% | 44.12% | -40.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.46% | 54.84% | -49.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.84% | 54.84% | -50.00% |
BTFAX vs. BITO - Expense Ratio Comparison
BTFAX has a 1.65% expense ratio, which is higher than BITO's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
BTFAX vs. BITO - Dividend Comparison
BTFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.85%, less than BITO's 62.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BITO ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF | 62.24% | 78.29% | 61.59% | 15.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BTFAX BTS Tactical Fixed Income Fund | 3.85% | 4.39% | 2.71% | 3.52% | 2.11% | 1.69% | 0.68% | 3.17% | 3.38% | 2.67% | 4.89% | 0.87% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BTFAX and BITO have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BITO has higher volatility (11.12%) compared to BTFAX (0.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTFAX dropped -19.78% vs BITO's -77.86%.
BTFAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.36 vs -1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BTFAX and BITO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer