PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BTF vs. DBE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BTF vs. DBE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Valkyrie Bitcoin and Ether Strategy ETF (BTF) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTF achieves a -30.57% return, which is significantly lower than DBE's 79.50% return.


BTF

1D
-5.41%
1M
-16.05%
YTD
-30.57%
6M
-32.41%
1Y
-32.30%
3Y*
14.70%
5Y*
10Y*

DBE

1D
0.80%
1M
-3.65%
YTD
79.50%
6M
72.59%
1Y
82.31%
3Y*
22.48%
5Y*
19.20%
10Y*
11.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BTF vs. DBE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BTF
Valkyrie Bitcoin and Ether Strategy ETF
-30.57%-12.44%67.60%136.86%-63.05%-26.38%
DBE
Invesco DB Energy Fund
79.50%-2.17%2.96%-12.14%33.77%-8.07%

Correlation

The correlation between BTF and DBE is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2021

0.04

The correlation between BTF and DBE shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.04 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BTF vs. DBE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTF
BTF Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
BTF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTF Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTF Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
BTF Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTF Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

DBE
DBE Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
DBE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBE Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
DBE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBE Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTF vs. DBE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Valkyrie Bitcoin and Ether Strategy ETF (BTF) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BTFDBEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.60

2.37

-2.97

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.63

2.91

-3.53

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.93

1.39

-0.46

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.59

6.10

-6.69

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.99

11.98

-12.98

BTF vs. DBE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BTF Sharpe Ratio is -0.60, which is lower than the DBE Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTF and DBE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BTFDBEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.60

2.37

-2.97

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.15

0.09

-0.24

Drawdowns

BTF vs. DBE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTF drawdown since its inception was -77.50%, smaller than the maximum DBE drawdown of -86.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTF and DBE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BTFDBEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.50%

-86.69%

+9.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-55.75%

-14.41%

-41.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-55.75%

-23.89%

-31.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-54.59%

-31.85%

-22.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-39.64%

-57.31%

+17.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

33.13%

7.34%

+25.79%

Volatility

BTF vs. DBE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Valkyrie Bitcoin and Ether Strategy ETF (BTF) is 9.46%, while Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE) has a volatility of 13.47%. This indicates that BTF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BTFDBEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.46%

13.47%

-4.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.97%

30.80%

+9.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

54.18%

35.02%

+19.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

58.42%

29.37%

+29.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

58.42%

28.33%

+30.09%

BTF vs. DBE - Expense Ratio Comparison

BTF has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is higher than DBE's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

BTF vs. DBE - Dividend Comparison

BTF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 209.94%, more than DBE's 2.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BTF
Valkyrie Bitcoin and Ether Strategy ETF
209.94%146.05%52.96%15.98%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DBE
Invesco DB Energy Fund
2.15%3.86%6.32%3.87%0.75%0.00%0.00%1.79%1.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


BTF and DBE have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBE has higher volatility (13.47%) compared to BTF (9.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTF dropped -77.50% vs DBE's -86.69%.

On 3-year performance, DBE leads with 22.48% vs 14.70% for BTF. On fees, DBE is cheaper at 0.78% per year. On volatility, BTF has been the lower-risk option at 9.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, DBE has performed better with a 22.48% return vs 14.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DBE is cheaper with a 0.78% expense ratio, compared with 1.24% for BTF.

BTF has the higher dividend yield at 209.94%, compared with 2.15% for DBE.

BTF is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while DBE is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Valkyrie and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 1.24% for BTF and 0.78% for DBE.

DBE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs -0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BTF and DBE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer