PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BTF vs. CEPI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BTF vs. CEPI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Valkyrie Bitcoin and Ether Strategy ETF (BTF) and REX Crypto Equity Premium Income ETF (CEPI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTF achieves a -33.48% return, which is significantly lower than CEPI's 20.71% return.


BTF

1D
-4.19%
1M
-21.21%
YTD
-33.48%
6M
-37.41%
1Y
-36.83%
3Y*
13.08%
5Y*
10Y*

CEPI

1D
-1.35%
1M
7.21%
YTD
20.71%
6M
18.40%
1Y
34.07%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BTF vs. CEPI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
BTF
Valkyrie Bitcoin and Ether Strategy ETF
-33.48%-12.44%-10.89%
CEPI
REX Crypto Equity Premium Income ETF
20.71%10.75%-9.02%

Correlation

The correlation between BTF and CEPI is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 5, 2024

0.70

The correlation between BTF and CEPI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BTF vs. CEPI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTF
BTF Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
BTF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTF Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTF Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
BTF Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTF Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

CEPI
CEPI Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
CEPI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CEPI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
CEPI Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
CEPI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
CEPI Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTF vs. CEPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Valkyrie Bitcoin and Ether Strategy ETF (BTF) and REX Crypto Equity Premium Income ETF (CEPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BTFCEPIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.68

1.28

-1.96

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.80

1.78

-2.58

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

1.24

-0.33

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.65

1.52

-2.18

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.11

3.62

-4.73

BTF vs. CEPI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BTF Sharpe Ratio is -0.68, which is lower than the CEPI Sharpe Ratio of 1.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTF and CEPI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BTFCEPIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.68

1.28

-1.96

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.16

0.45

-0.61

Drawdowns

BTF vs. CEPI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTF drawdown since its inception was -77.50%, which is greater than CEPI's maximum drawdown of -29.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTF and CEPI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BTFCEPIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.50%

-29.48%

-48.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-56.49%

-22.47%

-34.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-56.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-56.49%

-2.08%

-54.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-39.65%

-8.65%

-31.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

33.32%

9.43%

+23.89%

Volatility

BTF vs. CEPI - Volatility Comparison

Valkyrie Bitcoin and Ether Strategy ETF (BTF) has a higher volatility of 9.55% compared to REX Crypto Equity Premium Income ETF (CEPI) at 5.92%. This indicates that BTF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CEPI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BTFCEPIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.55%

5.92%

+3.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.47%

20.94%

+18.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

54.33%

26.79%

+27.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

58.43%

31.57%

+26.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

58.43%

31.57%

+26.86%

BTF vs. CEPI - Expense Ratio Comparison

BTF has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is higher than CEPI's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

BTF vs. CEPI - Dividend Comparison

BTF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 219.12%, more than CEPI's 42.71% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
BTF
Valkyrie Bitcoin and Ether Strategy ETF
219.12%146.05%52.96%15.98%
CEPI
REX Crypto Equity Premium Income ETF
42.71%50.78%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BTF and CEPI have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BTF has higher volatility (9.55%) compared to CEPI (5.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTF dropped -77.50% vs CEPI's -29.48%.

On 1-year performance, CEPI leads with 34.07% vs -36.83% for BTF. On fees, CEPI is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, CEPI has been the lower-risk option at 5.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CEPI has performed better with a 34.07% return vs -36.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CEPI is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 1.24% for BTF.

BTF has the higher dividend yield at 219.12%, compared with 42.71% for CEPI.

They also come from different issuers: Valkyrie and REX. Their fees differ too: 1.24% for BTF and 0.85% for CEPI.

CEPI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.28 vs -0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BTF and CEPI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer