BTF vs. BFOC
BTF (Valkyrie Bitcoin and Ether Strategy ETF) and BFOC (FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October) are both exchange-traded funds - BTF is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Valkyrie, while BFOC is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by First Trust. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BTF charges 1.24%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for BFOC.
Performance
BTF vs. BFOC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BTF achieves a -30.57% return, which is significantly lower than BFOC's -7.17% return.
BTF
- 1D
- -5.41%
- 1M
- -16.05%
- YTD
- -30.57%
- 6M
- -32.41%
- 1Y
- -32.30%
- 3Y*
- 14.70%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BFOC
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- -2.23%
- YTD
- -7.17%
- 6M
- -8.40%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BTF vs. BFOC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BTF Valkyrie Bitcoin and Ether Strategy ETF | -30.57% | -29.46% |
BFOC FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October | -7.17% | -9.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between BTF and BFOC is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2025 | 0.89 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BTF vs. BFOC — Risk / Return Rank
BTF
BFOC
BTF vs. BFOC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Valkyrie Bitcoin and Ether Strategy ETF (BTF) and FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October (BFOC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BTF | BFOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.60 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.63 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.59 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.99 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BTF | BFOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.60 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.15 | -1.86 | +1.71 |
Drawdowns
BTF vs. BFOC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTF drawdown since its inception was -77.50%, which is greater than BFOC's maximum drawdown of -18.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTF and BFOC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BTF | BFOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.50% | -18.01% | -59.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -55.75% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -55.75% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -54.59% | -18.01% | -36.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -39.64% | -12.48% | -27.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 33.13% | — | — |
Volatility
BTF vs. BFOC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BTF | BFOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.46% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.97% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 54.18% | 12.64% | +41.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 58.42% | 12.64% | +45.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 58.42% | 12.64% | +45.78% |
BTF vs. BFOC - Expense Ratio Comparison
BTF has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is higher than BFOC's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
BTF vs. BFOC - Dividend Comparison
BTF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 209.94%, while BFOC has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BFOC FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BTF Valkyrie Bitcoin and Ether Strategy ETF | 209.94% | 146.05% | 52.96% | 15.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BTF and BFOC have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BFOC is cheaper at 0.90% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BFOC is cheaper with a 0.90% expense ratio, compared with 1.24% for BTF.
BTF has the higher dividend yield at 209.94%, compared with 0.00% for BFOC.
BTF is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while BFOC is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Valkyrie and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 1.24% for BTF and 0.90% for BFOC.
Find the right allocation for BTF and BFOC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer