BTF vs. BETE

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BTF (Valkyrie Bitcoin and Ether Strategy ETF) and BETE (Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. Over the past year, BTF returned -36.83% vs -35.67% for BETE. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. BTF charges 1.24%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BETE.

Performance

BTF vs. BETE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Valkyrie Bitcoin and Ether Strategy ETF (BTF) and Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF (BETE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with BTF having a -33.48% return and BETE slightly lower at -34.13%.

BTF

• 1D: -4.19%
• 1M: -21.21%
• YTD: -33.48%
• 6M: -37.41%
• 1Y: -36.83%
• 3Y*: 13.08%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BETE

• 1D: -4.17%
• 1M: -21.37%
• YTD: -34.13%
• 6M: -38.03%
• 1Y: -35.67%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BTF vs. BETE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BTF Valkyrie Bitcoin and Ether Strategy ETF	-33.48%	-12.44%	67.60%	48.37%
BETE Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF	-34.13%	-8.17%	66.02%	40.23%

Correlation

The correlation between BTF and BETE is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.00
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2023	0.99

The correlation between BTF and BETE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BTF vs. BETE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTF

BTF Risk / Return Rank: 3
BTF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
BTF Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
BTF Omega Ratio Rank: 4
BTF Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
BTF Martin Ratio Rank: 4

BETE

BETE Risk / Return Rank: 4
BETE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
BETE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
BETE Omega Ratio Rank: 4
BETE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
BETE Martin Ratio Rank: 4

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTF vs. BETE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Valkyrie Bitcoin and Ether Strategy ETF (BTF) and Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF (BETE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BTF	BETE	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.68	-0.65	-0.03
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.80	-0.74	-0.06
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.91	0.92	-0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.65	-0.63	-0.02
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.11	-1.07	-0.04
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BTF vs. BETE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BTF Sharpe Ratio is -0.68, which is comparable to the BETE Sharpe Ratio of -0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTF and BETE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BTF	BETE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.68	-0.65	-0.03
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.16	0.24	-0.41

Drawdowns

BTF vs. BETE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTF drawdown since its inception was -77.50%, which is greater than BETE's maximum drawdown of -56.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTF and BETE.

Drawdown Indicators

	BTF	BETE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-77.50%	-56.81%	-20.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-56.49%	-56.81%	+0.32%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-56.49%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-56.49%	-56.81%	+0.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-39.65%	-21.36%	-18.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	33.32%	33.46%	-0.14%

Volatility

BTF vs. BETE - Volatility Comparison

Valkyrie Bitcoin and Ether Strategy ETF (BTF) and Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF (BETE) have volatilities of 9.55% and 9.55%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BTF	BETE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.55%	9.55%	0.00%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	39.47%	40.03%	-0.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	54.33%	54.95%	-0.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	58.43%	56.48%	+1.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	58.43%	56.48%	+1.95%

BTF vs. BETE - Expense Ratio Comparison

BTF has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is higher than BETE's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

BTF vs. BETE - Dividend Comparison

BTF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 219.12%, more than BETE's 83.91% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BETE Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF	83.91%	68.22%	15.22%	0.78%
BTF Valkyrie Bitcoin and Ether Strategy ETF	219.12%	146.05%	52.96%	15.98%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BTF and BETE in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 1.00, BTF and BETE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, BTF or BETE?

BETE has higher volatility (9.55%) compared to BTF (9.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTF dropped -77.50% vs BETE's -56.81%.

Which ETF is better, BTF or BETE?

On 1-year performance, BETE leads with -35.67% vs -36.83% for BTF. On fees, BETE is cheaper at 0.95% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BTF or BETE?

Over the 1-year period, BETE has performed better with a -35.67% return vs -36.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BTF or BETE?

BETE is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.24% for BTF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BTF or BETE?

BTF has the higher dividend yield at 219.12%, compared with 83.91% for BETE.

What is the main difference between BTF and BETE?

They also come from different issuers: Valkyrie and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.24% for BTF and 0.95% for BETE.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BETE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.65 vs -0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.