BTEK vs. STHH
BTEK (Future Tech ETF) and STHH (STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged) are both Technology Equities funds. BTEK is actively managed, while STHH is passively managed. BTEK charges 0.88%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for STHH.
Performance
BTEK vs. STHH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BTEK
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
STHH
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- -5.88%
- 6M
- 152.65%
- YTD
- 183.33%
- 1Y
- 130.81%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BTEK vs. STHH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BTEK Future Tech ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
STHH STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged | 183.33% | 17.60% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BTEK vs. STHH — Risk / Return Rank
BTEK
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
STHH
BTEK vs. STHH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Future Tech ETF (BTEK) and STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged (STHH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BTEK | STHH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.39 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.73 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.36 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BTEK vs. STHH - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BTEK | STHH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -33.89% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -33.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -9.52% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -10.16% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 15.09% | — |
Volatility
BTEK vs. STHH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BTEK | STHH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 21.14% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 42.43% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 53.77% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 51.90% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 51.90% | — |
BTEK vs. STHH - Expense Ratio Comparison
BTEK has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than STHH's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
BTEK vs. STHH - Dividend Comparison
BTEK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while STHH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.71%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BTEK Future Tech ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
STHH STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged | 0.71% | 0.69% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, STHH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
STHH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for BTEK.
STHH has the higher dividend yield at 0.71%, compared with 0.00% for BTEK.
They also come from different issuers: BlackRock and ADRhedged. Their fees differ too: 0.88% for BTEK and 0.19% for STHH.
Find the right allocation for BTEK and STHH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer