PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BTEK.L vs. ^XNG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BTEK.L vs. ^XNG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Nasdaq US Biotechnology UCITS ETF (BTEK.L) and NYSE Arca Natural Gas Index (^XNG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

BTEK.L is traded in GBP, while ^XNG is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ^XNG values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTEK.L achieves a 4.86% return, which is significantly lower than ^XNG's 19.96% return.


BTEK.L

1D
3.56%
1M
2.25%
YTD
4.86%
6M
2.70%
1Y
43.15%
3Y*
10.19%
5Y*
5.85%
10Y*

^XNG

1D
0.92%
1M
-4.19%
YTD
19.96%
6M
13.92%
1Y
24.76%
3Y*
14.60%
5Y*
16.94%
10Y*
4.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BTEK.L vs. ^XNG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BTEK.L
iShares Nasdaq US Biotechnology UCITS ETF
4.86%23.81%-0.32%0.33%-1.55%0.90%23.11%21.63%-6.34%-3.31%
^XNG
NYSE Arca Natural Gas Index
19.96%1.64%18.58%-2.32%37.15%55.63%-19.91%-7.05%-28.80%3.92%

Correlation

The correlation between BTEK.L and ^XNG is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2017

0.18

The correlation between BTEK.L and ^XNG shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.18 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BTEK.L vs. ^XNG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTEK.L
BTEK.L Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
BTEK.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTEK.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTEK.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
BTEK.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTEK.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

^XNG
^XNG Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
^XNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^XNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
^XNG Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
^XNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
^XNG Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTEK.L vs. ^XNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Nasdaq US Biotechnology UCITS ETF (BTEK.L) and NYSE Arca Natural Gas Index (^XNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BTEK.L^XNGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.25

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.23

2.15

+4.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.55

5.89

+11.67

BTEK.L vs. ^XNG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BTEK.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is higher than the ^XNG Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTEK.L and ^XNG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BTEK.L^XNGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.24

1.47

+0.77

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

0.81

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.16

+0.15

Drawdowns

BTEK.L vs. ^XNG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTEK.L drawdown since its inception was -30.86%, smaller than the maximum ^XNG drawdown of -78.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTEK.L and ^XNG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BTEK.L^XNGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.86%

-78.00%

+47.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.89%

-11.59%

+4.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.34%

-16.94%

-9.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.86%

-25.17%

-5.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-76.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.86%

-9.27%

+7.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.04%

-23.44%

+13.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.45%

4.22%

-1.77%

Volatility

BTEK.L vs. ^XNG - Volatility Comparison

iShares Nasdaq US Biotechnology UCITS ETF (BTEK.L) and NYSE Arca Natural Gas Index (^XNG) have volatilities of 6.91% and 6.95%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BTEK.L^XNGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.91%

6.95%

-0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.67%

13.75%

+0.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.14%

17.02%

+2.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.08%

21.09%

-1.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.71%

28.83%

-7.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


BTEK.L and ^XNG have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BTEK.L and ^XNG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer