BTEE.L vs. DRDR.L
BTEE.L (iShares Nasdaq US Biotechnology UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and DRDR.L (iShares Healthcare Innovation UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds from iShares - BTEE.L tracks the NASDAQ Biotechnology TR USD while DRDR.L tracks the MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BTEE.L returned 4.70%/yr vs -1.95%/yr for DRDR.L. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BTEE.L charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for DRDR.L.
Performance
BTEE.L vs. DRDR.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
BTEE.L is traded in USD, while DRDR.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the DRDR.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BTEE.L achieves a 4.58% return, which is significantly higher than DRDR.L's 0.76% return.
BTEE.L
- 1D
- 3.30%
- 1M
- 1.17%
- YTD
- 4.58%
- 6M
- 3.18%
- 1Y
- 41.45%
- 3Y*
- 13.12%
- 5Y*
- 4.70%
- 10Y*
- —
DRDR.L
- 1D
- 3.53%
- 1M
- 5.26%
- YTD
- 0.76%
- 6M
- 0.26%
- 1Y
- 20.58%
- 3Y*
- 6.09%
- 5Y*
- -1.95%
- 10Y*
- —
BTEE.L vs. DRDR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BTEE.L iShares Nasdaq US Biotechnology UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 4.58% | 32.82% | -1.69% | 5.84% | -11.88% | -0.57% | 27.55% | 25.56% | -14.84% |
DRDR.L iShares Healthcare Innovation UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.76% | 18.57% | 0.91% | 2.63% | -24.02% | -6.07% | 53.25% | 13.25% | -13.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between BTEE.L and DRDR.L is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2018 | 0.83 |
The correlation between BTEE.L and DRDR.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
BTEE.L vs. DRDR.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BTEE.L
DRDR.L
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
BTEE.L
DRDR.L
Basic Materials
BTEE.L
-
DRDR.L
Communication Services
BTEE.L
-
DRDR.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
BTEE.L
-
DRDR.L
-
Consumer Defensive
BTEE.L
-
DRDR.L
Energy
BTEE.L
-
DRDR.L
-
Financial Services
BTEE.L
-
DRDR.L
Industrials
BTEE.L
-
DRDR.L
Real Estate
BTEE.L
-
DRDR.L
-
Technology
BTEE.L
-
DRDR.L
Utilities
BTEE.L
-
DRDR.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BTEE.L vs. DRDR.L — Risk / Return Rank
BTEE.L
DRDR.L
BTEE.L vs. DRDR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Nasdaq US Biotechnology UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (BTEE.L) and iShares Healthcare Innovation UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (DRDR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BTEE.L | DRDR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.88 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.22 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.41 | 1.58 | +3.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.70 | 3.89 | +12.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BTEE.L | DRDR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.10 | 1.23 | +0.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 | -0.10 | +0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.33 | -0.02 |
Drawdowns
BTEE.L vs. DRDR.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTEE.L drawdown since its inception was -38.29%, smaller than the maximum DRDR.L drawdown of -46.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTEE.L and DRDR.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BTEE.L | DRDR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.29% | -46.15% | +7.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.63% | -12.93% | +5.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.82% | -21.31% | -5.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.29% | -43.52% | +5.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.58% | -19.74% | +17.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.56% | -18.53% | +4.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.47% | 5.27% | -2.80% |
Volatility
BTEE.L vs. DRDR.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Nasdaq US Biotechnology UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (BTEE.L) has a higher volatility of 6.84% compared to iShares Healthcare Innovation UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (DRDR.L) at 5.04%. This indicates that BTEE.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DRDR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BTEE.L | DRDR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.84% | 5.04% | +1.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.33% | 12.58% | +2.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.63% | 16.71% | +2.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.14% | 19.39% | +1.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.50% | 19.70% | +2.80% |
BTEE.L vs. DRDR.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
BTEE.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than DRDR.L's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
BTEE.L vs. DRDR.L - Dividend Comparison
BTEE.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, while DRDR.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BTEE.L iShares Nasdaq US Biotechnology UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 0.36% | 0.37% | 0.46% | 0.39% | 0.44% | 0.25% | 0.17% | 0.14% | 0.07% |
DRDR.L iShares Healthcare Innovation UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BTEE.L and DRDR.L have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BTEE.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BTEE.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for DRDR.L.
BTEE.L tracks NASDAQ Biotechnology TR USD, while DRDR.L tracks MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for BTEE.L and 0.40% for DRDR.L.
Find the right allocation for BTEE.L and DRDR.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer