PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BTEE.L vs. DRDR.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BTEE.L vs. DRDR.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Nasdaq US Biotechnology UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (BTEE.L) and iShares Healthcare Innovation UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (DRDR.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

BTEE.L is traded in USD, while DRDR.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the DRDR.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTEE.L achieves a 4.58% return, which is significantly higher than DRDR.L's 0.76% return.


BTEE.L

1D
3.30%
1M
1.17%
YTD
4.58%
6M
3.18%
1Y
41.45%
3Y*
13.12%
5Y*
4.70%
10Y*

DRDR.L

1D
3.53%
1M
5.26%
YTD
0.76%
6M
0.26%
1Y
20.58%
3Y*
6.09%
5Y*
-1.95%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BTEE.L vs. DRDR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
BTEE.L
iShares Nasdaq US Biotechnology UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
4.58%32.82%-1.69%5.84%-11.88%-0.57%27.55%25.56%-14.84%
DRDR.L
iShares Healthcare Innovation UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.76%18.57%0.91%2.63%-24.02%-6.07%53.25%13.25%-13.33%

Correlation

The correlation between BTEE.L and DRDR.L is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2018

0.83

The correlation between BTEE.L and DRDR.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

BTEE.L vs. DRDR.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BTEE.L
DRDR.L

Healthcare

100.0%
98.0%

Basic Materials

-

0.4%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

0.1%

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

0.2%

Industrials

-

0.4%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

1.2%

Utilities

-

-

Healthcare

BTEE.L
100.0%
DRDR.L
98.0%

Basic Materials

BTEE.L

-

DRDR.L
0.4%

Communication Services

BTEE.L

-

DRDR.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

BTEE.L

-

DRDR.L

-

Consumer Defensive

BTEE.L

-

DRDR.L
0.1%

Energy

BTEE.L

-

DRDR.L

-

Financial Services

BTEE.L

-

DRDR.L
0.2%

Industrials

BTEE.L

-

DRDR.L
0.4%

Real Estate

BTEE.L

-

DRDR.L

-

Technology

BTEE.L

-

DRDR.L
1.2%

Utilities

BTEE.L

-

DRDR.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BTEE.L vs. DRDR.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTEE.L
BTEE.L Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
BTEE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTEE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTEE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
BTEE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTEE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

DRDR.L
DRDR.L Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
DRDR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRDR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRDR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
DRDR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRDR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTEE.L vs. DRDR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Nasdaq US Biotechnology UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (BTEE.L) and iShares Healthcare Innovation UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (DRDR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BTEE.LDRDR.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.22

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.41

1.58

+3.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.70

3.89

+12.81

BTEE.L vs. DRDR.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BTEE.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is higher than the DRDR.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTEE.L and DRDR.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BTEE.LDRDR.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.10

1.23

+0.88

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

-0.10

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.33

-0.02

Drawdowns

BTEE.L vs. DRDR.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTEE.L drawdown since its inception was -38.29%, smaller than the maximum DRDR.L drawdown of -46.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTEE.L and DRDR.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BTEE.LDRDR.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.29%

-46.15%

+7.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.63%

-12.93%

+5.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.82%

-21.31%

-5.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.29%

-43.52%

+5.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.58%

-19.74%

+17.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.56%

-18.53%

+4.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.47%

5.27%

-2.80%

Volatility

BTEE.L vs. DRDR.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Nasdaq US Biotechnology UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (BTEE.L) has a higher volatility of 6.84% compared to iShares Healthcare Innovation UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (DRDR.L) at 5.04%. This indicates that BTEE.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DRDR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BTEE.LDRDR.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.84%

5.04%

+1.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.33%

12.58%

+2.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.63%

16.71%

+2.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.14%

19.39%

+1.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.50%

19.70%

+2.80%

BTEE.L vs. DRDR.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

BTEE.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than DRDR.L's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

BTEE.L vs. DRDR.L - Dividend Comparison

BTEE.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, while DRDR.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BTEE.L
iShares Nasdaq US Biotechnology UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
0.36%0.37%0.46%0.39%0.44%0.25%0.17%0.14%0.07%
DRDR.L
iShares Healthcare Innovation UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BTEE.L and DRDR.L have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BTEE.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BTEE.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for DRDR.L.

BTEE.L tracks NASDAQ Biotechnology TR USD, while DRDR.L tracks MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for BTEE.L and 0.40% for DRDR.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BTEE.L and DRDR.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer