BTEC vs. CANC

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

BTEC (Principal Healthcare Innovators Index ETF) and CANC (Tema Oncology ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds. BTEC is passively managed, while CANC is actively managed. BTEC charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for CANC.

Performance

BTEC vs. CANC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal Healthcare Innovators Index ETF (BTEC) and Tema Oncology ETF (CANC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

BTEC

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CANC

• 1D: 2.35%
• 1M: -1.68%
• YTD: 7.29%
• 6M: 5.50%
• 1Y: 48.14%
• 3Y*: 113.46%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BTEC vs. CANC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
BTEC Principal Healthcare Innovators Index ETF	0.00%
CANC Tema Oncology ETF	1.83%

BTEC vs. CANC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BTEC	CANC
Healthcare	99.4%	100.0%
Industrials	0.6%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

BTEC vs. CANC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CANC

CANC Risk / Return Rank: 71
CANC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
CANC Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
CANC Omega Ratio Rank: 56
CANC Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
CANC Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTEC vs. CANC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Healthcare Innovators Index ETF (BTEC) and Tema Oncology ETF (CANC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BTEC	CANC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.09	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	-0.03	—

Drawdowns

BTEC vs. CANC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTEC drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum CANC drawdown of -97.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTEC and CANC.

Drawdown Indicators

	BTEC	CANC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-97.53%	+97.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-8.67%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-30.27%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-55.52%	+55.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-73.18%	+73.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.27%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BTEC	CANC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	6.73%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	16.70%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.00%	23.19%	-23.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.00%	280.16%	-280.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.00%	280.16%	-280.16%

BTEC vs. CANC - Expense Ratio Comparison

BTEC has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than CANC's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

BTEC vs. CANC - Dividend Comparison

BTEC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CANC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BTEC Principal Healthcare Innovators Index ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
CANC Tema Oncology ETF	0.05%	0.06%	3.00%	0.56%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, BTEC or CANC?

On fees, BTEC is cheaper at 0.42% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BTEC or CANC?

BTEC is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for CANC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BTEC or CANC?

CANC has the higher dividend yield at 0.05%, compared with 0.00% for BTEC.

What is the main difference between BTEC and CANC?

They also come from different issuers: Principal and Tema. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for BTEC and 0.75% for CANC.