BTE vs. BZ=F

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

BTE (Baytex Energy Corp) is a stock, while BZ=F (Crude Oil Brent) is an asset. Over the past 10 years, BTE returned -0.44%/yr vs 6.53%/yr for BZ=F. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

BTE vs. BZ=F - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Baytex Energy Corp (BTE) and Crude Oil Brent (BZ=F). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with BTE having a 57.90% return and BZ=F slightly lower at 56.35%. Over the past 10 years, BTE has underperformed BZ=F with an annualized return of -0.44%, while BZ=F has yielded a comparatively higher 6.53% annualized return.

BTE

• 1D: 0.79%
• 1M: -2.87%
• YTD: 57.90%
• 6M: 60.25%
• 1Y: 204.52%
• 3Y*: 16.22%
• 5Y*: 25.73%
• 10Y*: -0.44%

BZ=F

• 1D: -2.73%
• 1M: -13.41%
• YTD: 56.35%
• 6M: 50.40%
• 1Y: 46.69%
• 3Y*: 7.44%
• 5Y*: 5.76%
• 10Y*: 6.53%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BTE vs. BZ=F - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BTE Baytex Energy Corp	57.90%	28.83%	-20.55%	-25.70%	45.95%	476.49%	-63.03%	-17.61%	-41.33%	-38.52%
BZ=F Crude Oil Brent	56.35%	-18.48%	-3.12%	-10.32%	10.45%	50.15%	-21.52%	22.68%	-19.55%	17.69%

Correlation

The correlation between BTE and BZ=F is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.48
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.60
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.62
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.60
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2006	0.57

The correlation between BTE and BZ=F shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (1 year) to 0.62 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

BTE vs. BZ=F — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTE

BTE Risk / Return Rank: 97
BTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
BTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
BTE Omega Ratio Rank: 94
BTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
BTE Martin Ratio Rank: 98

BZ=F

BZ=F Risk / Return Rank: 29
BZ=F Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
BZ=F Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
BZ=F Omega Ratio Rank: 20
BZ=F Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
BZ=F Martin Ratio Rank: 35

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTE vs. BZ=F - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baytex Energy Corp (BTE) and Crude Oil Brent (BZ=F). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BTE	BZ=F	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	4.34	0.86	+3.48
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.30	1.32	+2.98
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.54	1.20	+0.35
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	13.23	1.74	+11.48
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	34.05	2.92	+31.13
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BTE vs. BZ=F - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BTE Sharpe Ratio is 4.34, which is higher than the BZ=F Sharpe Ratio of 0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTE and BZ=F, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BTE	BZ=F	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.34	0.86	+3.48
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.48	0.15	+0.33
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.01	0.16	-0.17
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.03	0.13	-0.16

Drawdowns

BTE vs. BZ=F - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTE drawdown since its inception was -99.55%, which is greater than BZ=F's maximum drawdown of -86.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTE and BZ=F.

Drawdown Indicators

	BTE	BZ=F	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.55%	-86.77%	-12.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.57%	-23.63%	+8.06%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-66.67%	-38.97%	-27.70%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-78.29%	-53.96%	-24.33%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-96.87%	-77.60%	-19.27%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-88.35%	-34.87%	-53.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-60.70%	-40.98%	-19.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.03%	11.46%	-5.43%

Volatility

BTE vs. BZ=F - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Baytex Energy Corp (BTE) is 11.45%, while Crude Oil Brent (BZ=F) has a volatility of 15.08%. This indicates that BTE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BZ=F based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BTE	BZ=F	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.45%	15.08%	-3.63%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	29.04%	45.73%	-16.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	47.56%	47.65%	-0.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	54.38%	37.44%	+16.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	65.97%	39.20%	+26.77%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BTE and BZ=F in my portfolio?

BTE and BZ=F have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BTE or BZ=F?

BZ=F has higher volatility (15.08%) compared to BTE (11.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTE dropped -99.55% vs BZ=F's -86.77%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BTE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.34 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.