PortfoliosLab logo
BZ=F vs. OIH
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between BZ=F and OIH is 0.19, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

BZ=F vs. OIH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Crude Oil Brent (BZ=F) and VanEck Vectors Oil Services ETF (OIH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BZ=F:

-0.75

OIH:

-0.77

Sortino Ratio

BZ=F:

-0.91

OIH:

-0.91

Omega Ratio

BZ=F:

0.89

OIH:

0.87

Calmar Ratio

BZ=F:

-0.36

OIH:

-0.33

Martin Ratio

BZ=F:

-1.38

OIH:

-1.53

Ulcer Index

BZ=F:

15.46%

OIH:

17.95%

Daily Std Dev

BZ=F:

28.29%

OIH:

36.62%

Max Drawdown

BZ=F:

-86.77%

OIH:

-94.24%

Current Drawdown

BZ=F:

-55.76%

OIH:

-79.21%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BZ=F achieves a -13.42% return, which is significantly higher than OIH's -15.55% return. Over the past 10 years, BZ=F has outperformed OIH with an annualized return of -0.25%, while OIH has yielded a comparatively lower -9.76% annualized return.


BZ=F

YTD

-13.42%

1M

-0.08%

6M

-10.94%

1Y

-21.91%

5Y*

14.35%

10Y*

-0.25%

OIH

YTD

-15.55%

1M

8.93%

6M

-21.22%

1Y

-28.03%

5Y*

19.38%

10Y*

-9.76%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

BZ=F vs. OIH — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BZ=F

OIH
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of OIH is 22
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of OIH is 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of OIH is 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of OIH is 11
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of OIH is 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of OIH is 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BZ=F vs. OIH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Crude Oil Brent (BZ=F) and VanEck Vectors Oil Services ETF (OIH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current BZ=F Sharpe Ratio is -0.75, which is comparable to the OIH Sharpe Ratio of -0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BZ=F and OIH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Drawdowns

BZ=F vs. OIH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BZ=F drawdown since its inception was -86.77%, smaller than the maximum OIH drawdown of -94.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BZ=F and OIH. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

BZ=F vs. OIH - Volatility Comparison

Crude Oil Brent (BZ=F) and VanEck Vectors Oil Services ETF (OIH) have volatilities of 9.90% and 9.43%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...