BTCY.TO vs. KILO.TO
BTCY.TO (Purpose Bitcoin Yield ETF - ETF Units) and KILO.TO (Purpose Gold Bullion Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - BTCY.TO is a fund fund actively managed by Purpose Investments, while KILO.TO is a Gold fund actively managed by Purpose Investments. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, BTCY.TO returned 15.47%/yr vs 25.66%/yr for KILO.TO. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BTCY.TO vs. KILO.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BTCY.TO achieves a -37.72% return, which is significantly lower than KILO.TO's -7.73% return.
BTCY.TO
- 1D
- -1.27%
- 1M
- -26.45%
- YTD
- -37.72%
- 6M
- -37.67%
- 1Y
- -49.85%
- 3Y*
- 15.47%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KILO.TO
- 1D
- 1.04%
- 1M
- -10.97%
- YTD
- -7.73%
- 6M
- -11.16%
- 1Y
- 17.79%
- 3Y*
- 25.66%
- 5Y*
- 16.22%
- 10Y*
- —
BTCY.TO vs. KILO.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BTCY.TO Purpose Bitcoin Yield ETF - ETF Units | -37.72% | -9.07% | 112.59% | 111.84% | -64.51% | -18.42% |
KILO.TO Purpose Gold Bullion Fund | -7.73% | 60.17% | 25.97% | 12.15% | -0.90% | 3.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between BTCY.TO and KILO.TO is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2021 | 0.12 |
The correlation between BTCY.TO and KILO.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (all time) to 0.27 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BTCY.TO vs. KILO.TO — Risk / Return Rank
BTCY.TO
KILO.TO
BTCY.TO vs. KILO.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Purpose Bitcoin Yield ETF - ETF Units (BTCY.TO) and Purpose Gold Bullion Fund (KILO.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BTCY.TO | KILO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.82 | 1.14 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.89 | 0.66 | -1.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.58 | 1.83 | -3.42 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BTCY.TO vs. KILO.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTCY.TO drawdown since its inception was -71.53%, which is greater than KILO.TO's maximum drawdown of -26.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTCY.TO and KILO.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BTCY.TO | KILO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.53% | -26.91% | -44.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -55.88% | -26.91% | -28.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -55.88% | -26.91% | -28.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.91% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -55.88% | -26.15% | -29.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.32% | -6.81% | -26.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 31.55% | 9.72% | +21.83% |
Volatility
BTCY.TO vs. KILO.TO - Volatility Comparison
Purpose Bitcoin Yield ETF - ETF Units (BTCY.TO) has a higher volatility of 15.47% compared to Purpose Gold Bullion Fund (KILO.TO) at 8.49%. This indicates that BTCY.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KILO.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BTCY.TO | KILO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.47% | 8.49% | +6.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.74% | 23.80% | +16.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 48.59% | 27.39% | +21.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.98% | 18.19% | +32.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.98% | 17.90% | +33.08% |
Dividends
BTCY.TO vs. KILO.TO - Dividend Comparison
BTCY.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 26.29%, while KILO.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BTCY.TO Purpose Bitcoin Yield ETF - ETF Units | 26.29% | 15.11% | 16.69% | 9.20% | 24.17% | 1.23% | 0.00% |
KILO.TO Purpose Gold Bullion Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BTCY.TO and KILO.TO have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for BTCY.TO and KILO.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer