BTCW vs. UGA

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

BTCW (Wisdom Tree Bitcoin Fund) and UGA (United States Gasoline Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - BTCW is a Cryptocurrency fund managed by WisdomTree, while UGA is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Unleaded Gasoline. Over the past year, BTCW returned -39.83% vs 59.74% for UGA. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BTCW charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for UGA.

Performance

BTCW vs. UGA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wisdom Tree Bitcoin Fund (BTCW) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTCW achieves a -28.98% return, which is significantly lower than UGA's 64.09% return.

BTCW

• 1D: -3.29%
• 1M: -17.89%
• YTD: -28.98%
• 6M: -29.03%
• 1Y: -39.83%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

UGA

• 1D: -1.12%
• 1M: -12.11%
• YTD: 64.09%
• 6M: 60.42%
• 1Y: 59.74%
• 3Y*: 18.95%
• 5Y*: 22.69%
• 10Y*: 14.31%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BTCW vs. UGA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
BTCW Wisdom Tree Bitcoin Fund	-28.98%	-6.05%	92.79%
UGA United States Gasoline Fund LP	64.09%	-2.00%	5.58%

Correlation

The correlation between BTCW and UGA is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.07
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024	0.01

Return for Risk

BTCW vs. UGA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTCW

BTCW Risk / Return Rank: 2
BTCW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
BTCW Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
BTCW Omega Ratio Rank: 2
BTCW Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
BTCW Martin Ratio Rank: 2

UGA

UGA Risk / Return Rank: 55
UGA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
UGA Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
UGA Omega Ratio Rank: 49
UGA Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
UGA Martin Ratio Rank: 56

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTCW vs. UGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wisdom Tree Bitcoin Fund (BTCW) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BTCW	UGA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.91	1.73	-2.64
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.26	2.25	-3.51
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.86	1.30	-0.44
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.77	3.17	-3.93
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.31	9.39	-10.70

BTCW vs. UGA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BTCW Sharpe Ratio is -0.91, which is lower than the UGA Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTCW and UGA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BTCW vs. UGA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTCW drawdown since its inception was -52.10%, smaller than the maximum UGA drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTCW and UGA.

Drawdown Indicators

	BTCW	UGA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-52.10%	-86.59%	+34.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-52.10%	-18.96%	-33.14%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-26.68%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-38.11%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-75.89%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-50.50%	-18.05%	-32.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.79%	-36.69%	+19.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	30.54%	6.43%	+24.11%

Volatility

BTCW vs. UGA - Volatility Comparison

Wisdom Tree Bitcoin Fund (BTCW) has a higher volatility of 13.13% compared to United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA) at 9.24%. This indicates that BTCW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UGA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BTCW	UGA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.13%	9.24%	+3.89%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	34.47%	30.57%	+3.90%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	44.10%	35.22%	+8.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	50.09%	34.45%	+15.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	50.09%	37.22%	+12.87%

BTCW vs. UGA - Expense Ratio Comparison

BTCW has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than UGA's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

BTCW vs. UGA - Dividend Comparison

Neither BTCW nor UGA has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BTCW and UGA in my portfolio?

BTCW and UGA have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BTCW or UGA?

BTCW has higher volatility (13.13%) compared to UGA (9.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTCW dropped -52.10% vs UGA's -86.59%.

Which ETF is better, BTCW or UGA?

On 1-year performance, UGA leads with 59.74% vs -39.83% for BTCW. On fees, BTCW is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, UGA has been the lower-risk option at 9.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BTCW or UGA?

Over the 1-year period, UGA has performed better with a 59.74% return vs -39.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BTCW or UGA?

BTCW is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UGA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BTCW or UGA?

BTCW and UGA have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between BTCW and UGA?

BTCW is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while UGA is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for BTCW and 0.75% for UGA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

UGA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs -0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.