BTCW vs. RBIL

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

BTCW (Wisdom Tree Bitcoin Fund) and RBIL (F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BTCW is a Cryptocurrency fund managed by WisdomTree, while RBIL is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. Over the past year, BTCW returned -39.83% vs 4.07% for RBIL. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions. BTCW charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for RBIL.

Performance

BTCW vs. RBIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wisdom Tree Bitcoin Fund (BTCW) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTCW achieves a -28.98% return, which is significantly lower than RBIL's 2.32% return.

BTCW

• 1D: -3.29%
• 1M: -17.89%
• YTD: -28.98%
• 6M: -29.03%
• 1Y: -39.83%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RBIL

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: -0.19%
• YTD: 2.32%
• 6M: 2.37%
• 1Y: 4.07%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BTCW vs. RBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BTCW Wisdom Tree Bitcoin Fund	-28.98%	-6.94%
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF	2.32%	2.85%

Correlation

The correlation between BTCW and RBIL is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.11
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2025	-0.07

Return for Risk

BTCW vs. RBIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTCW

BTCW Risk / Return Rank: 2
BTCW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
BTCW Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
BTCW Omega Ratio Rank: 2
BTCW Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
BTCW Martin Ratio Rank: 2

RBIL

RBIL Risk / Return Rank: 97
RBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
RBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
RBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 98
RBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
RBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTCW vs. RBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wisdom Tree Bitcoin Fund (BTCW) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BTCW	RBIL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.91	4.35	-5.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.26	6.69	-7.95
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.86	2.13	-1.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.77	7.82	-8.59
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.31	42.95	-44.26

BTCW vs. RBIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BTCW Sharpe Ratio is -0.91, which is lower than the RBIL Sharpe Ratio of 4.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTCW and RBIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BTCW vs. RBIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTCW drawdown since its inception was -52.10%, which is greater than RBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTCW and RBIL.

Drawdown Indicators

	BTCW	RBIL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-52.10%	-0.52%	-51.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-52.10%	-0.52%	-51.58%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-50.50%	-0.50%	-50.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.79%	-0.07%	-16.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	30.54%	0.10%	+30.44%

Volatility

BTCW vs. RBIL - Volatility Comparison

Wisdom Tree Bitcoin Fund (BTCW) has a higher volatility of 13.13% compared to F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL) at 0.36%. This indicates that BTCW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BTCW	RBIL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.13%	0.36%	+12.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	34.47%	0.85%	+33.62%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	44.10%	0.95%	+43.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	50.09%	1.07%	+49.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	50.09%	1.07%	+49.02%

BTCW vs. RBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

BTCW has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than RBIL's 0.17% expense ratio.

Dividends

BTCW vs. RBIL - Dividend Comparison

BTCW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RBIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.38%.

Position	TTM	2025
BTCW Wisdom Tree Bitcoin Fund	0.00%	0.00%
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF	4.38%	3.65%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BTCW and RBIL in my portfolio?

BTCW and RBIL have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BTCW or RBIL?

BTCW has higher volatility (13.13%) compared to RBIL (0.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTCW dropped -52.10% vs RBIL's -0.52%.

Which ETF is better, BTCW or RBIL?

On 1-year performance, RBIL leads with 4.07% vs -39.83% for BTCW. On fees, RBIL is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, RBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BTCW or RBIL?

Over the 1-year period, RBIL has performed better with a 4.07% return vs -39.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BTCW or RBIL?

RBIL is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for BTCW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BTCW or RBIL?

RBIL has the higher dividend yield at 4.38%, compared with 0.00% for BTCW.

What is the main difference between BTCW and RBIL?

BTCW is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while RBIL is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and F/m. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for BTCW and 0.17% for RBIL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.35 vs -0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.