BTCW vs. BFAP

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

BTCW (Wisdom Tree Bitcoin Fund) and BFAP (FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - April) are both Cryptocurrency funds. Over the past year, BTCW returned -46.38% vs -29.32% for BFAP. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. BTCW charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for BFAP.

Performance

BTCW vs. BFAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wisdom Tree Bitcoin Fund (BTCW) and FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - April (BFAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTCW achieves a -26.78% return, which is significantly lower than BFAP's -21.16% return.

BTCW

• 1D: -1.08%
• 1M: -2.26%
• 6M: -32.70%
• YTD: -26.78%
• 1Y: -46.38%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BFAP

• 1D: -0.49%
• 1M: -0.59%
• 6M: -26.27%
• YTD: -21.16%
• 1Y: -29.32%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BTCW vs. BFAP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BTCW Wisdom Tree Bitcoin Fund	-26.78%	6.82%
BFAP FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - April	-21.16%	8.90%

Correlation

The correlation between BTCW and BFAP is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2025	0.96

The correlation between BTCW and BFAP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BTCW vs. BFAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTCW

BTCW Risk / Return Rank: 2
BTCW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
BTCW Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
BTCW Omega Ratio Rank: 2
BTCW Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
BTCW Martin Ratio Rank: 2

BFAP

BFAP Risk / Return Rank: 1
BFAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
BFAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
BFAP Omega Ratio Rank: 1
BFAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
BFAP Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTCW vs. BFAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wisdom Tree Bitcoin Fund (BTCW) and FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - April (BFAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BTCW	BFAP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.06	-1.37	+0.31
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.60	-1.94	+0.34
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.82	0.77	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.87	-0.86	-0.01
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.40	-1.46	+0.06

BTCW vs. BFAP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BTCW Sharpe Ratio is -1.06, which is comparable to the BFAP Sharpe Ratio of -1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTCW and BFAP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BTCW vs. BFAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTCW drawdown since its inception was -53.37%, which is greater than BFAP's maximum drawdown of -34.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTCW and BFAP.

Drawdown Indicators

	BTCW	BFAP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.37%	-34.15%	-19.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-53.37%	-34.15%	-19.22%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-48.96%	-31.48%	-17.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.65%	-12.68%	-4.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	33.11%	20.14%	+12.97%

Volatility

BTCW vs. BFAP - Volatility Comparison

Wisdom Tree Bitcoin Fund (BTCW) has a higher volatility of 10.75% compared to FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - April (BFAP) at 4.52%. This indicates that BTCW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BFAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BTCW	BFAP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.75%	4.52%	+6.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	34.69%	16.29%	+18.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	44.16%	21.50%	+22.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	49.79%	20.25%	+29.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	49.79%	20.25%	+29.54%

BTCW vs. BFAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

BTCW has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than BFAP's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

BTCW vs. BFAP - Dividend Comparison

BTCW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BFAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 24.06%.

Position	TTM	2025
BFAP FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - April	24.06%	18.97%
BTCW Wisdom Tree Bitcoin Fund	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BTCW and BFAP in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.97, BTCW and BFAP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, BTCW or BFAP?

BTCW has higher volatility (10.75%) compared to BFAP (4.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTCW dropped -53.37% vs BFAP's -34.15%.

Which ETF is better, BTCW or BFAP?

On 1-year performance, BFAP leads with -29.32% vs -46.38% for BTCW. On fees, BTCW is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, BFAP has been the lower-risk option at 4.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BTCW or BFAP?

Over the 1-year period, BFAP has performed better with a -29.32% return vs -46.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BTCW or BFAP?

BTCW is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for BFAP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BTCW or BFAP?

BFAP has the higher dividend yield at 24.06%, compared with 0.00% for BTCW.

What is the main difference between BTCW and BFAP?

They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for BTCW and 0.90% for BFAP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BTCW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-1.06 vs -1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.