BTCO vs. SPHD
BTCO (Invesco Galaxy Bitcoin ETF) and SPHD (Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BTCO is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Lukka Prime Reference Bitcoin Rate, while SPHD is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P 500 Low Volatility High Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, BTCO returned -38.71% vs 8.12% for SPHD. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BTCO charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for SPHD.
Performance
BTCO vs. SPHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BTCO achieves a -25.40% return, which is significantly lower than SPHD's 4.38% return.
BTCO
- 1D
- -2.74%
- 1M
- -18.43%
- YTD
- -25.40%
- 6M
- -29.84%
- 1Y
- -38.71%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPHD
- 1D
- -0.89%
- 1M
- -0.82%
- YTD
- 4.38%
- 6M
- 4.63%
- 1Y
- 8.12%
- 3Y*
- 11.42%
- 5Y*
- 5.48%
- 10Y*
- 7.08%
BTCO vs. SPHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
BTCO Invesco Galaxy Bitcoin ETF | -25.40% | -6.58% | 100.54% |
SPHD Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF | 4.38% | 3.41% | 17.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between BTCO and SPHD is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2024 | 0.17 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BTCO vs. SPHD — Risk / Return Rank
BTCO
SPHD
BTCO vs. SPHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Galaxy Bitcoin ETF (BTCO) and Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BTCO | SPHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 1.13 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.79 | 1.11 | -1.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.36 | 2.78 | -4.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BTCO | SPHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.89 | 0.74 | -1.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.39 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.40 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.58 | -0.27 |
Drawdowns
BTCO vs. SPHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTCO drawdown since its inception was -49.33%, which is greater than SPHD's maximum drawdown of -41.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTCO and SPHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BTCO | SPHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.33% | -41.39% | -7.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -49.33% | -7.33% | -42.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.50% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.39% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -48.03% | -5.37% | -42.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.95% | -4.70% | -11.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 28.41% | 2.93% | +25.48% |
Volatility
BTCO vs. SPHD - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Galaxy Bitcoin ETF (BTCO) has a higher volatility of 9.46% compared to Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD) at 2.99%. This indicates that BTCO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BTCO | SPHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.46% | 2.99% | +6.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.37% | 7.55% | +26.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.56% | 11.04% | +32.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.77% | 14.16% | +35.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.77% | 17.64% | +32.13% |
BTCO vs. SPHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
BTCO has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than SPHD's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
BTCO vs. SPHD - Dividend Comparison
BTCO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.62%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BTCO Invesco Galaxy Bitcoin ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPHD Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF | 4.62% | 4.02% | 3.41% | 4.48% | 3.89% | 3.45% | 4.89% | 4.07% | 4.40% | 3.14% | 3.83% | 3.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BTCO and SPHD have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BTCO has higher volatility (9.46%) compared to SPHD (2.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTCO dropped -49.33% vs SPHD's -41.39%.
On 1-year performance, SPHD leads with 8.12% vs -38.71% for BTCO. On fees, SPHD is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, SPHD has been the lower-risk option at 2.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SPHD has performed better with a 8.12% return vs -38.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPHD is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for BTCO.
SPHD has the higher dividend yield at 4.62%, compared with 0.00% for BTCO.
BTCO is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while SPHD is Dividend. BTCO tracks Lukka Prime Reference Bitcoin Rate, while SPHD tracks S&P 500 Low Volatility High Dividend Index. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for BTCO and 0.30% for SPHD.
SPHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.74 vs -0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BTCO and SPHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer