BTCO vs. SOEZ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BTCO (Invesco Galaxy Bitcoin ETF) and SOEZ (Franklin Solana ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. BTCO is passively managed, while SOEZ is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BTCO charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for SOEZ.

Performance

BTCO vs. SOEZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Galaxy Bitcoin ETF (BTCO) and Franklin Solana ETF (SOEZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTCO achieves a -25.40% return, which is significantly higher than SOEZ's -40.75% return.

BTCO

• 1D: -2.74%
• 1M: -18.43%
• YTD: -25.40%
• 6M: -29.84%
• 1Y: -38.71%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SOEZ

• 1D: -4.56%
• 1M: -14.51%
• YTD: -40.75%
• 6M: -47.84%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BTCO vs. SOEZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BTCO Invesco Galaxy Bitcoin ETF	-25.40%	-5.96%
SOEZ Franklin Solana ETF	-40.75%	-11.97%

Correlation

The correlation between BTCO and SOEZ is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2025	0.90

Return for Risk

BTCO vs. SOEZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTCO

BTCO Risk / Return Rank: 2
BTCO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
BTCO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
BTCO Omega Ratio Rank: 2
BTCO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
BTCO Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTCO vs. SOEZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Galaxy Bitcoin ETF (BTCO) and Franklin Solana ETF (SOEZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BTCO	SOEZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.89	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.23	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.86	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.79	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.36	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BTCO	SOEZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.89	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.30	-1.07	+1.37

Drawdowns

BTCO vs. SOEZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTCO drawdown since its inception was -49.33%, roughly equal to the maximum SOEZ drawdown of -50.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTCO and SOEZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	BTCO	SOEZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-49.33%	-50.21%	+0.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-49.33%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-48.03%	-50.21%	+2.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.95%	-30.80%	+14.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	28.41%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BTCO	SOEZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.46%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	34.37%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	43.56%	68.92%	-25.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	49.77%	68.92%	-19.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	49.77%	68.92%	-19.15%

BTCO vs. SOEZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

BTCO has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than SOEZ's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

BTCO vs. SOEZ - Dividend Comparison

BTCO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SOEZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%.

Position	TTM
BTCO Invesco Galaxy Bitcoin ETF	0.00%
SOEZ Franklin Solana ETF	0.57%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BTCO and SOEZ in my portfolio?

BTCO and SOEZ have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BTCO or SOEZ?

On fees, SOEZ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BTCO or SOEZ?

SOEZ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for BTCO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BTCO or SOEZ?

SOEZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.57%, compared with 0.00% for BTCO.

What is the main difference between BTCO and SOEZ?

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Franklin. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for BTCO and 0.19% for SOEZ.