BTCO vs. SCUS

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

BTCO (Invesco Galaxy Bitcoin ETF) and SCUS (Schwab Ultra-Short Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BTCO is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Lukka Prime Reference Bitcoin Rate, while SCUS is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Charles Schwab. BTCO is passively managed, while SCUS is actively managed. Over the past year, BTCO returned -37.76% vs 3.94% for SCUS. At a correlation of -0.09, they often move in opposite directions. BTCO charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for SCUS.

Performance

BTCO vs. SCUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Galaxy Bitcoin ETF (BTCO) and Schwab Ultra-Short Income ETF (SCUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTCO achieves a -26.44% return, which is significantly lower than SCUS's 1.49% return.

BTCO

• 1D: 2.36%
• 1M: -14.96%
• YTD: -26.44%
• 6M: -27.12%
• 1Y: -37.76%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SCUS

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: 0.18%
• YTD: 1.49%
• 6M: 1.61%
• 1Y: 3.94%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BTCO vs. SCUS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
BTCO Invesco Galaxy Bitcoin ETF	-26.44%	-6.58%	57.97%
SCUS Schwab Ultra-Short Income ETF	1.49%	4.51%	2.00%

Correlation

The correlation between BTCO and SCUS is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.09
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 13, 2024	-0.09

Return for Risk

BTCO vs. SCUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTCO

BTCO Risk / Return Rank: 3
BTCO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
BTCO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
BTCO Omega Ratio Rank: 3
BTCO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
BTCO Martin Ratio Rank: 3

SCUS

SCUS Risk / Return Rank: 99
SCUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
SCUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
SCUS Omega Ratio Rank: 98
SCUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
SCUS Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTCO vs. SCUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Galaxy Bitcoin ETF (BTCO) and Schwab Ultra-Short Income ETF (SCUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BTCO	SCUS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.86	5.84	-6.70
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.17	11.18	-12.34
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.87	2.56	-1.69
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.73	23.76	-24.48
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.24	102.91	-104.16

BTCO vs. SCUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BTCO Sharpe Ratio is -0.86, which is lower than the SCUS Sharpe Ratio of 5.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTCO and SCUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BTCO vs. SCUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTCO drawdown since its inception was -52.05%, which is greater than SCUS's maximum drawdown of -0.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTCO and SCUS.

Drawdown Indicators

	BTCO	SCUS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-52.05%	-0.17%	-51.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-52.05%	-0.17%	-51.88%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-48.76%	-0.08%	-48.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.68%	-0.02%	-16.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	30.38%	0.04%	+30.34%

Volatility

BTCO vs. SCUS - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Galaxy Bitcoin ETF (BTCO) has a higher volatility of 12.86% compared to Schwab Ultra-Short Income ETF (SCUS) at 0.22%. This indicates that BTCO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BTCO	SCUS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.86%	0.22%	+12.64%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	34.44%	0.50%	+33.94%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	44.11%	0.68%	+43.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	49.74%	0.71%	+49.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	49.74%	0.71%	+49.03%

BTCO vs. SCUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

BTCO has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than SCUS's 0.14% expense ratio.

Dividends

BTCO vs. SCUS - Dividend Comparison

BTCO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.91%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BTCO Invesco Galaxy Bitcoin ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SCUS Schwab Ultra-Short Income ETF	3.91%	4.17%	1.62%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BTCO and SCUS in my portfolio?

BTCO and SCUS have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BTCO or SCUS?

BTCO has higher volatility (12.86%) compared to SCUS (0.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTCO dropped -52.05% vs SCUS's -0.17%.

Which ETF is better, BTCO or SCUS?

On 1-year performance, SCUS leads with 3.94% vs -37.76% for BTCO. On fees, SCUS is cheaper at 0.14% per year. On volatility, SCUS has been the lower-risk option at 0.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BTCO or SCUS?

Over the 1-year period, SCUS has performed better with a 3.94% return vs -37.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BTCO or SCUS?

SCUS is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for BTCO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BTCO or SCUS?

SCUS has the higher dividend yield at 3.91%, compared with 0.00% for BTCO.

What is the main difference between BTCO and SCUS?

BTCO is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while SCUS is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for BTCO and 0.14% for SCUS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SCUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.84 vs -0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.