BTCL vs. SCUS
BTCL (T-REX 2X Long Bitcoin Daily Target ETF) and SCUS (Schwab Ultra-Short Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BTCL is a Leveraged Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by REX, while SCUS is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Charles Schwab. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BTCL returned -78.65% vs 3.93% for SCUS. Their -0.09 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. BTCL charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for SCUS.
Performance
BTCL vs. SCUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BTCL achieves a -56.96% return, which is significantly lower than SCUS's 2.08% return.
BTCL
- 1D
- 1.30%
- 1M
- 7.51%
- 6M
- -41.67%
- YTD
- -56.96%
- 1Y
- -78.65%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -26.85%
SCUS
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- 6M
- 1.69%
- YTD
- 2.08%
- 1Y
- 3.93%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 4.37%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $864.64K | $868.11K | $1.24M | |
| $2.92M | $2.66M | $2.92M |
BTCL vs. SCUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
BTCL T-REX 2X Long Bitcoin Daily Target ETF | -56.96% | -39.52% | 111.08% |
SCUS Schwab Ultra-Short Income ETF | 2.08% | 4.51% | 2.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between BTCL and SCUS is -0.09, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 13, 2024 | -0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BTCL vs. SCUS — Risk / Return Rank
BTCL
SCUS
BTCL vs. SCUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCL) and Schwab Ultra-Short Income ETF (SCUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BTCL | SCUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -6.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -12.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.81 | 2.53 | -1.72 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.94 | 23.70 | -24.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.30 | 99.88 | -101.19 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BTCL vs. SCUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTCL drawdown since its inception was -84.01%, which is greater than SCUS's maximum drawdown of -0.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTCL and SCUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BTCL | SCUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.01% | -0.17% | -83.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -84.01% | -0.17% | -83.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -81.29% | 0.00% | -81.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.93% | -0.02% | -37.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 60.42% | 0.04% | +60.38% |
Volatility
BTCL vs. SCUS - Volatility Comparison
T-REX 2X Long Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCL) has a higher volatility of 16.06% compared to Schwab Ultra-Short Income ETF (SCUS) at 0.19%. This indicates that BTCL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BTCL | SCUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.06% | 0.19% | +15.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 66.67% | 0.51% | +66.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 88.55% | 0.69% | +87.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 96.09% | 0.70% | +95.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 96.09% | 0.70% | +95.39% |
BTCL vs. SCUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
BTCL has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SCUS's 0.14% expense ratio.
Dividends
BTCL vs. SCUS - Dividend Comparison
BTCL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.94%, more than SCUS's 3.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BTCL T-REX 2X Long Bitcoin Daily Target ETF | 3.94% | 1.70% | 4.35% |
SCUS Schwab Ultra-Short Income ETF | 3.87% | 4.17% | 1.62% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BTCL and SCUS have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BTCL has higher volatility (16.06%) compared to SCUS (0.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTCL dropped -84.01% vs SCUS's -0.17%.
On 1-year performance, SCUS leads with 3.93% vs -78.65% for BTCL. On fees, SCUS is cheaper at 0.14% per year. On volatility, SCUS has been the lower-risk option at 0.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SCUS has performed better with a 3.93% return vs -78.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCUS is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BTCL.
BTCL has the higher dividend yield at 3.94%, compared with 3.87% for SCUS.
BTCL is categorized as Leveraged Cryptocurrency, while SCUS is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: REX and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BTCL and 0.14% for SCUS.
SCUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.77 vs -0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BTCL and SCUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer