BTCK vs. EZBC

Last updated Jul 8, 2026

BTCK (7RCC Spot Bitcoin and Carbon Credit Futures ETF) and EZBC (Franklin Bitcoin ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds - BTCK tracks the 7RCC Kaiko Bitcoin Carbon Credit Index while EZBC tracks the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Both are passively managed. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BTCK charges 0.44%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for EZBC.

Performance

BTCK vs. EZBC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in 7RCC Spot Bitcoin and Carbon Credit Futures ETF (BTCK) and Franklin Bitcoin ETF (EZBC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

BTCK

• 1D: 0.99%
• 1M: 1.74%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EZBC

• 1D: 0.16%
• 1M: 5.86%
• 6M: -31.07%
• YTD: -27.11%
• 1Y: -41.08%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BTCK vs. EZBC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
BTCK 7RCC Spot Bitcoin and Carbon Credit Futures ETF	-5.52%
EZBC Franklin Bitcoin ETF	-2.36%

Correlation

The correlation between BTCK and EZBC is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2026	0.42

Return for Risk

BTCK vs. EZBC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTCK

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

EZBC

EZBC Risk / Return Rank: 2
EZBC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
EZBC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
EZBC Omega Ratio Rank: 2
EZBC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
EZBC Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTCK vs. EZBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 7RCC Spot Bitcoin and Carbon Credit Futures ETF (BTCK) and Franklin Bitcoin ETF (EZBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BTCK	EZBC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	-0.93	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	-1.31	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	0.85	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	-0.77	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	-1.28	—

Drawdowns

BTCK vs. EZBC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTCK drawdown since its inception was -8.40%, smaller than the maximum EZBC drawdown of -53.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTCK and EZBC.

Drawdown Indicators

	BTCK	EZBC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.40%	-53.35%	+44.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-53.35%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.15%	-49.26%	+42.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.01%	-17.39%	+12.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	32.09%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BTCK	EZBC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	13.10%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	34.98%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	44.57%	44.40%	+0.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	44.57%	49.99%	-5.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	44.57%	49.99%	-5.42%

BTCK vs. EZBC - Expense Ratio Comparison

BTCK has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is higher than EZBC's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

BTCK vs. EZBC - Dividend Comparison

Neither BTCK nor EZBC has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BTCK and EZBC in my portfolio?

BTCK and EZBC have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BTCK or EZBC?

On fees, EZBC is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BTCK or EZBC?

EZBC is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.44% for BTCK.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BTCK or EZBC?

BTCK and EZBC have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between BTCK and EZBC?

BTCK tracks 7RCC Kaiko Bitcoin Carbon Credit Index, while EZBC tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. They also come from different issuers: 7RCC and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.44% for BTCK and 0.19% for EZBC.