BTCI vs. XQQI
BTCI (NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF) and XQQI (NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BTCI is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Neos, while XQQI is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Neos. Both are actively managed. Their 0.53 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. BTCI charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.98%/yr for XQQI.
Performance
BTCI vs. XQQI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BTCI
- 1D
- -2.39%
- 1M
- 2.51%
- 6M
- -23.02%
- YTD
- -25.73%
- 1Y
- -40.21%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -4.18%
XQQI
- 1D
- 1.25%
- 1M
- -4.84%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $12.53M | $12.80M | $22.67M | |
| $11.42M | $14.18M | $14.54M |
BTCI vs. XQQI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BTCI NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF | -17.74% |
XQQI NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF | 4.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between BTCI and XQQI is 0.53, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2026 | 0.53 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BTCI vs. XQQI — Risk / Return Rank
BTCI
XQQI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BTCI vs. XQQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI) and NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (XQQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BTCI | XQQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.87 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.36 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BTCI vs. XQQI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTCI drawdown since its inception was -48.42%, which is greater than XQQI's maximum drawdown of -15.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTCI and XQQI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BTCI | XQQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.42% | -15.48% | -32.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -48.42% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -45.08% | -10.18% | -34.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.81% | -3.80% | -14.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 30.79% | — | — |
Volatility
BTCI vs. XQQI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BTCI | XQQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.31% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.70% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.00% | 28.32% | +11.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.67% | 28.32% | +11.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.67% | 28.32% | +11.35% |
BTCI vs. XQQI - Expense Ratio Comparison
BTCI has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than XQQI's 0.98% expense ratio.
Dividends
BTCI vs. XQQI - Dividend Comparison
BTCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 41.26%, more than XQQI's 10.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BTCI NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF | 41.26% | 36.46% | 6.76% |
XQQI NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF | 10.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BTCI and XQQI have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XQQI is cheaper at 0.98% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XQQI is cheaper with a 0.98% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for BTCI.
BTCI has the higher dividend yield at 41.26%, compared with 10.72% for XQQI.
BTCI is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while XQQI is Nasdaq-100. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for BTCI and 0.98% for XQQI.
Find the right allocation for BTCI and XQQI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer