BTCI vs. WGMI

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

BTCI (NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF) and WGMI (CoinShares Bitcoin Miners ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BTCI returned -41.43% vs 83.80% for WGMI. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BTCI charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for WGMI.

Performance

BTCI vs. WGMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI) and CoinShares Bitcoin Miners ETF (WGMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTCI achieves a -24.61% return, which is significantly lower than WGMI's 25.69% return.

BTCI

• 1D: -0.68%
• 1M: -3.01%
• 6M: -29.88%
• YTD: -24.61%
• 1Y: -41.43%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

WGMI

• 1D: -9.25%
• 1M: -30.55%
• 6M: 0.25%
• YTD: 25.69%
• 1Y: 83.80%
• 3Y*: 40.82%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BTCI vs. WGMI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
BTCI NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF	-24.61%	-1.09%	26.12%
WGMI CoinShares Bitcoin Miners ETF	25.69%	72.47%	4.30%

Correlation

The correlation between BTCI and WGMI is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.53
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2024	0.60

The correlation between BTCI and WGMI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BTCI vs. WGMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTCI

BTCI Risk / Return Rank: 2
BTCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
BTCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
BTCI Omega Ratio Rank: 2
BTCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
BTCI Martin Ratio Rank: 1

WGMI

WGMI Risk / Return Rank: 36
WGMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
WGMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
WGMI Omega Ratio Rank: 37
WGMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
WGMI Martin Ratio Rank: 29

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTCI vs. WGMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI) and CoinShares Bitcoin Miners ETF (WGMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BTCI	WGMI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.04	1.08	-2.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.52	1.75	-3.27
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.83	1.21	-0.38
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.86	1.65	-2.51
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.41	3.27	-4.68

BTCI vs. WGMI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BTCI Sharpe Ratio is -1.04, which is lower than the WGMI Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTCI and WGMI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BTCI vs. WGMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTCI drawdown since its inception was -48.42%, smaller than the maximum WGMI drawdown of -85.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTCI and WGMI.

Drawdown Indicators

	BTCI	WGMI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.42%	-85.76%	+37.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-48.42%	-50.94%	+2.52%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-62.79%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-44.25%	-33.29%	-10.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.15%	-42.11%	+24.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	29.39%	25.70%	+3.69%

Volatility

BTCI vs. WGMI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI) is 9.70%, while CoinShares Bitcoin Miners ETF (WGMI) has a volatility of 21.31%. This indicates that BTCI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WGMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BTCI	WGMI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.70%	21.31%	-11.61%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	31.60%	56.58%	-24.98%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	39.91%	78.03%	-38.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	40.04%	81.56%	-41.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	40.04%	81.56%	-41.52%

BTCI vs. WGMI - Expense Ratio Comparison

BTCI has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than WGMI's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

BTCI vs. WGMI - Dividend Comparison

BTCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 42.61%, while WGMI has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BTCI NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF	42.61%	36.46%	6.76%	0.00%
WGMI CoinShares Bitcoin Miners ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.22%	0.31%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BTCI and WGMI in my portfolio?

BTCI and WGMI have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BTCI or WGMI?

WGMI has higher volatility (21.31%) compared to BTCI (9.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTCI dropped -48.42% vs WGMI's -85.76%.

Which ETF is better, BTCI or WGMI?

On 1-year performance, WGMI leads with 83.80% vs -41.43% for BTCI. On fees, WGMI is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, BTCI has been the lower-risk option at 9.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BTCI or WGMI?

Over the 1-year period, WGMI has performed better with a 83.80% return vs -41.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BTCI or WGMI?

WGMI is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for BTCI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BTCI or WGMI?

BTCI has the higher dividend yield at 42.61%, compared with 0.00% for WGMI.

What is the main difference between BTCI and WGMI?

They also come from different issuers: Neos and CoinShares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for BTCI and 0.75% for WGMI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WGMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.08 vs -1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.