BTCI vs. SETH

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI) and ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF (SETH).

BTCI and SETH are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BTCI is an actively managed fund by Neos. It was launched on Oct 16, 2024. SETH is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Galaxy Ethereum (--100%). It was launched on Nov 1, 2023.

Performance

BTCI vs. SETH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI) and ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF (SETH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BTCI vs. SETH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
BTCI NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF	-20.23%	-1.09%	28.24%
SETH ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF	20.65%	-29.41%	-28.97%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTCI achieves a -20.23% return, which is significantly lower than SETH's 20.65% return.

BTCI

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: -0.24%
• YTD: -20.23%
• 6M: -37.90%
• 1Y: -15.50%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SETH

• 1D: -2.21%
• 1M: -7.87%
• YTD: 20.65%
• 6M: 57.31%
• 1Y: -45.49%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BTCI vs. SETH - Expense Ratio Comparison

BTCI has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than SETH's 0.95% expense ratio.

BTCI

NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF

SETH

ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF

Return for Risk

BTCI vs. SETH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTCI

BTCI Risk / Return Rank: 6
BTCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
BTCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
BTCI Omega Ratio Rank: 6
BTCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
BTCI Martin Ratio Rank: 7

SETH

SETH Risk / Return Rank: 4
SETH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
SETH Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
SETH Omega Ratio Rank: 4
SETH Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
SETH Martin Ratio Rank: 6

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTCI vs. SETH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI) and ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF (SETH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BTCI	SETH	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.39	-0.60	+0.21
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.30	-0.56	+0.25
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.96	0.93	+0.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.30	-0.64	+0.34
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.66	-0.81	+0.16
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BTCI vs. SETH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BTCI Sharpe Ratio is -0.39, which is higher than the SETH Sharpe Ratio of -0.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTCI and SETH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BTCI	SETH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.39	-0.60	+0.21
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.02	-0.52	+0.54

Correlation

The correlation between BTCI and SETH is -0.82. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.

Dividends

BTCI vs. SETH - Dividend Comparison

BTCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 43.58%, more than SETH's 11.38% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BTCI NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF	43.58%	36.46%	6.76%	0.00%
SETH ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF	11.38%	7.01%	3.44%	0.38%

Drawdowns

BTCI vs. SETH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTCI drawdown since its inception was -44.98%, smaller than the maximum SETH drawdown of -80.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTCI and SETH.

Drawdown Indicators

	BTCI	SETH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.98%	-80.74%	+35.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-44.98%	-75.02%	+30.04%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-41.01%	-66.86%	+25.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.85%	-53.84%	+40.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	20.50%	59.01%	-38.51%

Volatility

BTCI vs. SETH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI) is 10.21%, while ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF (SETH) has a volatility of 19.86%. This indicates that BTCI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SETH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BTCI	SETH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.21%	19.86%	-9.65%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	33.66%	53.29%	-19.63%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	40.04%	76.09%	-36.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	41.35%	71.15%	-29.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	41.35%	71.15%	-29.80%