PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BTCI vs. GDE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BTCI vs. GDE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund (GDE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTCI achieves a -24.93% return, which is significantly lower than GDE's 5.74% return.


BTCI

1D
5.05%
1M
-19.01%
YTD
-24.93%
6M
-26.93%
1Y
-34.15%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GDE

1D
0.95%
1M
-7.44%
YTD
5.74%
6M
8.50%
1Y
47.93%
3Y*
44.47%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BTCI vs. GDE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
BTCI
NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF
-24.93%-1.09%28.24%
GDE
WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund
5.74%73.76%-1.27%

Correlation

The correlation between BTCI and GDE is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2024

0.34

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BTCI vs. GDE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTCI
BTCI Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
BTCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTCI Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
BTCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTCI Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

GDE
GDE Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
GDE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDE Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
GDE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDE Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTCI vs. GDE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund (GDE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BTCIGDEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.86

1.31

-0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.73

2.13

-2.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.34

6.49

-7.83

BTCI vs. GDE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BTCI Sharpe Ratio is -0.87, which is lower than the GDE Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTCI and GDE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BTCIGDEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.87

1.66

-2.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.07

1.10

-1.17

Drawdowns

BTCI vs. GDE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTCI drawdown since its inception was -47.16%, which is greater than GDE's maximum drawdown of -32.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTCI and GDE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BTCIGDEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.16%

-32.01%

-15.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-47.16%

-22.66%

-24.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-44.49%

-14.44%

-30.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.40%

-7.90%

-7.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

25.53%

7.40%

+18.13%

Volatility

BTCI vs. GDE - Volatility Comparison

NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI) has a higher volatility of 10.95% compared to WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund (GDE) at 8.25%. This indicates that BTCI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GDE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BTCIGDEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.95%

8.25%

+2.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.23%

25.04%

+6.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.57%

29.09%

+10.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.40%

26.26%

+14.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.40%

26.26%

+14.14%

BTCI vs. GDE - Expense Ratio Comparison

BTCI has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than GDE's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

BTCI vs. GDE - Dividend Comparison

BTCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 44.41%, more than GDE's 4.09% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BTCI
NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF
44.41%36.46%6.76%0.00%0.00%
GDE
WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund
4.09%4.32%7.14%2.22%0.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


BTCI and GDE have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BTCI has higher volatility (10.95%) compared to GDE (8.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTCI dropped -47.16% vs GDE's -32.01%.

On 1-year performance, GDE leads with 47.93% vs -34.15% for BTCI. On fees, GDE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, GDE has been the lower-risk option at 8.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GDE has performed better with a 47.93% return vs -34.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GDE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for BTCI.

BTCI has the higher dividend yield at 44.41%, compared with 4.09% for GDE.

BTCI is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while GDE is Gold. They also come from different issuers: Neos and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for BTCI and 0.20% for GDE.

GDE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs -0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BTCI and GDE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer