BTCI vs. GDE
BTCI (NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF) and GDE (WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - BTCI is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Neos, while GDE is a Gold fund actively managed by WisdomTree. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BTCI returned -34.15% vs 47.93% for GDE. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BTCI charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for GDE.
Performance
BTCI vs. GDE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BTCI achieves a -24.93% return, which is significantly lower than GDE's 5.74% return.
BTCI
- 1D
- 5.05%
- 1M
- -19.01%
- YTD
- -24.93%
- 6M
- -26.93%
- 1Y
- -34.15%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GDE
- 1D
- 0.95%
- 1M
- -7.44%
- YTD
- 5.74%
- 6M
- 8.50%
- 1Y
- 47.93%
- 3Y*
- 44.47%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BTCI vs. GDE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
BTCI NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF | -24.93% | -1.09% | 28.24% |
GDE WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund | 5.74% | 73.76% | -1.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between BTCI and GDE is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2024 | 0.34 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BTCI vs. GDE — Risk / Return Rank
BTCI
GDE
BTCI vs. GDE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund (GDE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BTCI | GDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 1.31 | -0.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.73 | 2.13 | -2.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.34 | 6.49 | -7.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BTCI | GDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.87 | 1.66 | -2.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.07 | 1.10 | -1.17 |
Drawdowns
BTCI vs. GDE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTCI drawdown since its inception was -47.16%, which is greater than GDE's maximum drawdown of -32.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTCI and GDE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BTCI | GDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.16% | -32.01% | -15.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -47.16% | -22.66% | -24.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.66% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -44.49% | -14.44% | -30.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.40% | -7.90% | -7.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.53% | 7.40% | +18.13% |
Volatility
BTCI vs. GDE - Volatility Comparison
NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI) has a higher volatility of 10.95% compared to WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund (GDE) at 8.25%. This indicates that BTCI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GDE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BTCI | GDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.95% | 8.25% | +2.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.23% | 25.04% | +6.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.57% | 29.09% | +10.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.40% | 26.26% | +14.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.40% | 26.26% | +14.14% |
BTCI vs. GDE - Expense Ratio Comparison
BTCI has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than GDE's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
BTCI vs. GDE - Dividend Comparison
BTCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 44.41%, more than GDE's 4.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BTCI NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF | 44.41% | 36.46% | 6.76% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GDE WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund | 4.09% | 4.32% | 7.14% | 2.22% | 0.81% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BTCI and GDE have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BTCI has higher volatility (10.95%) compared to GDE (8.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTCI dropped -47.16% vs GDE's -32.01%.
On 1-year performance, GDE leads with 47.93% vs -34.15% for BTCI. On fees, GDE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, GDE has been the lower-risk option at 8.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GDE has performed better with a 47.93% return vs -34.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GDE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for BTCI.
BTCI has the higher dividend yield at 44.41%, compared with 4.09% for GDE.
BTCI is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while GDE is Gold. They also come from different issuers: Neos and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for BTCI and 0.20% for GDE.
GDE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs -0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BTCI and GDE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer