BTCI vs. EZET
BTCI (NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF) and EZET (Franklin Ethereum ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. BTCI is actively managed, while EZET is passively managed. Over the past year, BTCI returned -40.21% vs -46.86% for EZET. Their correlation of 0.82 means they have usually moved in the same direction. BTCI charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for EZET.
Performance
BTCI vs. EZET - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BTCI achieves a -25.73% return, which is significantly higher than EZET's -37.21% return.
BTCI
- 1D
- -2.39%
- 1M
- 2.51%
- 6M
- -23.02%
- YTD
- -25.73%
- 1Y
- -40.21%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -4.18%
EZET
- 1D
- -2.98%
- 1M
- 9.70%
- 6M
- -30.34%
- YTD
- -37.21%
- 1Y
- -46.86%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -26.91%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $12.53M | $12.80M | $22.67M | |
| $372.59K | $480.59K | $696.37K |
BTCI vs. EZET - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
BTCI NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF | -25.73% | -1.09% | 26.12% |
EZET Franklin Ethereum ETF | -37.21% | -11.23% | 27.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between BTCI and EZET is 0.90, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2024 | 0.82 |
The correlation between BTCI and EZET has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BTCI vs. EZET — Risk / Return Rank
BTCI
EZET
BTCI vs. EZET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI) and Franklin Ethereum ETF (EZET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BTCI | EZET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | 0.89 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.87 | -0.74 | -0.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.36 | -1.11 | -0.25 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BTCI vs. EZET - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTCI drawdown since its inception was -48.42%, smaller than the maximum EZET drawdown of -67.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTCI and EZET.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BTCI | EZET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.42% | -67.89% | +19.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -48.42% | -67.89% | +19.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -45.08% | -61.51% | +16.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.81% | -35.20% | +17.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 30.79% | 45.36% | -14.57% |
Volatility
BTCI vs. EZET - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI) is 7.31%, while Franklin Ethereum ETF (EZET) has a volatility of 13.02%. This indicates that BTCI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EZET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BTCI | EZET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.31% | 13.02% | -5.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.70% | 45.86% | -15.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.00% | 67.21% | -27.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.67% | 71.33% | -31.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.67% | 71.33% | -31.66% |
BTCI vs. EZET - Expense Ratio Comparison
BTCI has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than EZET's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
BTCI vs. EZET - Dividend Comparison
BTCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 41.26%, while EZET has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BTCI NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF | 41.26% | 36.46% | 6.76% |
EZET Franklin Ethereum ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, BTCI and EZET move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
EZET has higher volatility (13.02%) compared to BTCI (7.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTCI dropped -48.42% vs EZET's -67.89%.
On 1-year performance, BTCI leads with -40.21% vs -46.86% for EZET. On fees, EZET is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, BTCI has been the lower-risk option at 7.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BTCI has performed better with a -40.21% return vs -46.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EZET is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for BTCI.
BTCI has the higher dividend yield at 41.26%, compared with 0.00% for EZET.
They also come from different issuers: Neos and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for BTCI and 0.19% for EZET.
EZET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.75 vs -1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BTCI and EZET
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer