BTCI vs. BAGY

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

BTCI (NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF) and BAGY (Amplify Bitcoin Max Income Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BTCI is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Neos, while BAGY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Amplify. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BTCI returned -40.21% vs -43.56% for BAGY. Their 0.97 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. BTCI charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for BAGY.

Performance

BTCI vs. BAGY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI) and Amplify Bitcoin Max Income Covered Call ETF (BAGY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with BTCI having a -25.73% return and BAGY slightly higher at -25.41%.

BTCI

• 1D: -2.39%
• 1M: 2.51%
• 6M: -23.02%
• YTD: -25.73%
• 1Y: -40.21%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -4.18%

BAGY

• 1D: -3.04%
• 1M: 2.02%
• 6M: -23.70%
• YTD: -25.41%
• 1Y: -43.56%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -26.15%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BAGY Amplify Bitcoin Max Income Covered Call ETF	$101.08K	$73.24K	$162.64K
BTCI NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF	$12.53M	$12.80M	$22.67M

BTCI vs. BAGY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BTCI NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF	-25.73%	-3.92%
BAGY Amplify Bitcoin Max Income Covered Call ETF	-25.41%	-8.33%

Correlation

The correlation between BTCI and BAGY is 0.98 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.98
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2025	0.97

The correlation between BTCI and BAGY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BTCI vs. BAGY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BTCI

BTCI Risk / Return Rank: 1
BTCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
BTCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
BTCI Omega Ratio Rank: 2
BTCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
BTCI Martin Ratio Rank: 1

BAGY

BAGY Risk / Return Rank: 1
BAGY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
BAGY Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
BAGY Omega Ratio Rank: 2
BAGY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
BAGY Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BTCI vs. BAGY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI) and Amplify Bitcoin Max Income Covered Call ETF (BAGY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BTCI	BAGY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.05	-1.05	0.00
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.53	-1.56	+0.03
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.83	0.82	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.87	-0.90	+0.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.36	-1.41	+0.05

BTCI vs. BAGY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BTCI Sharpe Ratio is -1.05, which is comparable to the BAGY Sharpe Ratio of -1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTCI and BAGY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BTCI vs. BAGY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTCI drawdown since its inception was -48.42%, roughly equal to the maximum BAGY drawdown of -50.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTCI and BAGY.

Drawdown Indicators

	BTCI	BAGY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.42%	-50.68%	+2.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-48.42%	-50.68%	+2.26%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-45.08%	-47.52%	+2.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.81%	-23.05%	+5.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	30.79%	32.33%	-1.54%

Volatility

BTCI vs. BAGY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI) is 7.31%, while Amplify Bitcoin Max Income Covered Call ETF (BAGY) has a volatility of 9.56%. This indicates that BTCI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BAGY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BTCI	BAGY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.31%	9.56%	-2.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	30.70%	33.94%	-3.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	40.00%	43.52%	-3.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	39.67%	40.73%	-1.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	39.67%	40.73%	-1.06%

BTCI vs. BAGY - Expense Ratio Comparison

BTCI has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than BAGY's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

BTCI vs. BAGY - Dividend Comparison

BTCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 41.26%, less than BAGY's 56.20% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BAGY Amplify Bitcoin Max Income Covered Call ETF	56.20%	30.16%	0.00%
BTCI NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF	41.26%	36.46%	6.76%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BTCI and BAGY in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.98, BTCI and BAGY move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, BTCI or BAGY?

BAGY has higher volatility (9.56%) compared to BTCI (7.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTCI dropped -48.42% vs BAGY's -50.68%.

Which ETF is better, BTCI or BAGY?

On 1-year performance, BTCI leads with -40.21% vs -43.56% for BAGY. On fees, BAGY is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, BTCI has been the lower-risk option at 7.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BTCI or BAGY?

Over the 1-year period, BTCI has performed better with a -40.21% return vs -43.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BTCI or BAGY?

BAGY is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for BTCI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BTCI or BAGY?

BAGY has the higher dividend yield at 56.20%, compared with 41.26% for BTCI.

What is the main difference between BTCI and BAGY?

BTCI is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while BAGY is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Neos and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for BTCI and 0.65% for BAGY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BTCI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-1.05 vs -1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.