BTCI vs. ASGI
BTCI (NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF) and ASGI (Abrdn Global Infrastructure Income Fund) are both funds - BTCI is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Neos, while ASGI is a Industrials Equities fund managed by Aberdeen. Over the past year, BTCI returned -34.62% vs 22.98% for ASGI. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BTCI charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.65%/yr for ASGI.
Performance
BTCI vs. ASGI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BTCI achieves a -25.54% return, which is significantly lower than ASGI's 4.04% return.
BTCI
- 1D
- -2.32%
- 1M
- -16.42%
- YTD
- -25.54%
- 6M
- -25.93%
- 1Y
- -34.62%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ASGI
- 1D
- 2.12%
- 1M
- -7.85%
- YTD
- 4.04%
- 6M
- 5.99%
- 1Y
- 22.98%
- 3Y*
- 20.51%
- 5Y*
- 11.30%
- 10Y*
- —
BTCI vs. ASGI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
BTCI NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF | -25.54% | -1.09% | 26.12% |
ASGI Abrdn Global Infrastructure Income Fund | 4.04% | 44.20% | -9.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between BTCI and ASGI is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2024 | 0.16 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BTCI vs. ASGI — Risk / Return Rank
BTCI
ASGI
BTCI vs. ASGI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI) and Abrdn Global Infrastructure Income Fund (ASGI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BTCI | ASGI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 1.24 | -0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.74 | 1.62 | -2.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.31 | 5.30 | -6.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BTCI vs. ASGI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTCI drawdown since its inception was -47.16%, which is greater than ASGI's maximum drawdown of -23.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTCI and ASGI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BTCI | ASGI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.16% | -23.71% | -23.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -47.16% | -15.15% | -32.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.24% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.49% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -44.94% | -10.10% | -34.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.92% | -5.98% | -9.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.71% | 4.62% | +22.09% |
Volatility
BTCI vs. ASGI - Volatility Comparison
NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI) has a higher volatility of 12.11% compared to Abrdn Global Infrastructure Income Fund (ASGI) at 6.98%. This indicates that BTCI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ASGI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BTCI | ASGI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.11% | 6.98% | +5.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.18% | 17.03% | +14.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.53% | 19.15% | +20.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.31% | 16.80% | +23.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.31% | 17.52% | +22.79% |
BTCI vs. ASGI - Expense Ratio Comparison
BTCI has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than ASGI's 1.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
BTCI vs. ASGI - Dividend Comparison
BTCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 48.02%, more than ASGI's 11.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASGI Abrdn Global Infrastructure Income Fund | 11.68% | 10.96% | 12.84% | 8.03% | 8.25% | 6.33% | 1.76% |
BTCI NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF | 48.02% | 36.46% | 6.76% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BTCI and ASGI have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BTCI has higher volatility (12.11%) compared to ASGI (6.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTCI dropped -47.16% vs ASGI's -23.71%.
ASGI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.28 vs -0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BTCI and ASGI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer