BTCE.DE vs. EZA
BTCE.DE (ETC Group Physical Bitcoin) and EZA (iShares MSCI South Africa ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BTCE.DE is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by ETC Issuance, while EZA is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI South Africa Index. BTCE.DE is actively managed, while EZA is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BTCE.DE returned 10.38%/yr vs 10.51%/yr for EZA. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BTCE.DE charges 2.00%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for EZA.
Performance
BTCE.DE vs. EZA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
BTCE.DE is traded in EUR, while EZA is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the EZA values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BTCE.DE achieves a -27.02% return, which is significantly lower than EZA's -1.31% return.
BTCE.DE
- 1D
- -3.79%
- 1M
- -20.74%
- YTD
- -27.02%
- 6M
- -28.97%
- 1Y
- -41.00%
- 3Y*
- 28.04%
- 5Y*
- 10.38%
- 10Y*
- —
EZA
- 1D
- 0.97%
- 1M
- -4.28%
- YTD
- -1.31%
- 6M
- 4.29%
- 1Y
- 33.70%
- 3Y*
- 20.62%
- 5Y*
- 10.51%
- 10Y*
- 7.78%
BTCE.DE vs. EZA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BTCE.DE ETC Group Physical Bitcoin | -27.02% | -18.20% | 125.79% | 146.52% | -63.89% | 81.36% | 162.37% |
EZA iShares MSCI South Africa ETF | -1.31% | 54.41% | 14.23% | -1.54% | 0.70% | 15.98% | 17.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between BTCE.DE and EZA is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2020 | 0.17 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BTCE.DE vs. EZA — Risk / Return Rank
BTCE.DE
EZA
BTCE.DE vs. EZA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETC Group Physical Bitcoin (BTCE.DE) and iShares MSCI South Africa ETF (EZA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BTCE.DE | EZA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | 1.20 | -0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.83 | 1.42 | -2.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.46 | 3.78 | -5.24 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BTCE.DE vs. EZA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTCE.DE drawdown since its inception was -74.62%, which is greater than EZA's maximum drawdown of -59.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTCE.DE and EZA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BTCE.DE | EZA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.62% | -59.54% | -15.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -49.76% | -21.63% | -28.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -49.76% | -21.63% | -28.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -74.62% | -30.47% | -44.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -56.33% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -49.27% | -16.25% | -33.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.26% | -16.70% | -13.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 28.52% | 8.12% | +20.40% |
Volatility
BTCE.DE vs. EZA - Volatility Comparison
ETC Group Physical Bitcoin (BTCE.DE) and iShares MSCI South Africa ETF (EZA) have volatilities of 9.82% and 10.31%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BTCE.DE | EZA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.82% | 10.31% | -0.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.25% | 24.82% | +6.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.81% | 29.45% | +10.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 52.58% | 26.15% | +26.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 57.83% | 29.61% | +28.22% |
BTCE.DE vs. EZA - Expense Ratio Comparison
BTCE.DE has a 2.00% expense ratio, which is higher than EZA's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
BTCE.DE vs. EZA - Dividend Comparison
BTCE.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EZA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.34%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BTCE.DE ETC Group Physical Bitcoin | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EZA iShares MSCI South Africa ETF | 6.34% | 6.16% | 7.26% | 2.84% | 3.90% | 2.05% | 5.51% | 12.27% | 3.81% | 1.55% | 4.10% | 3.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BTCE.DE and EZA have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EZA is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EZA is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 2.00% for BTCE.DE.
BTCE.DE is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while EZA is Emerging Markets Equities. They also come from different issuers: ETC Issuance and iShares. Their fees differ too: 2.00% for BTCE.DE and 0.59% for EZA.
Find the right allocation for BTCE.DE and EZA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer