PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BTCC.TO vs. L.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BTCC.TO vs. L.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Purpose Bitcoin CAD ETF Currency Hedged Units (BTCC.TO) and Loblaw Companies Limited (L.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTCC.TO achieves a -27.91% return, which is significantly lower than L.TO's 2.62% return.


BTCC.TO

1D
2.25%
1M
-15.25%
YTD
-27.91%
6M
-28.50%
1Y
-40.03%
3Y*
23.71%
5Y*
10.67%
10Y*

L.TO

1D
-1.11%
1M
3.42%
YTD
2.62%
6M
2.89%
1Y
15.10%
3Y*
34.35%
5Y*
33.11%
10Y*
26.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BTCC.TO vs. L.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BTCC.TO
Purpose Bitcoin CAD ETF Currency Hedged Units
-27.91%-9.18%116.50%149.22%-65.78%-13.94%
L.TO
Loblaw Companies Limited
2.62%34.69%54.55%13.67%21.98%82.50%

Correlation

The correlation between BTCC.TO and L.TO is -0.25, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2021

-0.04

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between BTCC.TO and L.TO has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.04 to -0.25, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BTCC.TO vs. L.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTCC.TO
BTCC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BTCC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTCC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTCC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BTCC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTCC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

L.TO
L.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
L.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
L.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
L.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
L.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
L.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTCC.TO vs. L.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Purpose Bitcoin CAD ETF Currency Hedged Units (BTCC.TO) and Loblaw Companies Limited (L.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BTCC.TOL.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.86

1.14

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.76

1.04

-1.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.28

2.43

-3.72

BTCC.TO vs. L.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BTCC.TO Sharpe Ratio is -0.92, which is lower than the L.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTCC.TO and L.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BTCC.TO vs. L.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTCC.TO drawdown since its inception was -77.80%, which is greater than L.TO's maximum drawdown of -44.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTCC.TO and L.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BTCC.TOL.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.80%

-44.67%

-33.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-53.17%

-14.53%

-38.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-53.17%

-14.53%

-38.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-77.80%

-14.53%

-63.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-50.09%

-8.06%

-42.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.88%

-7.05%

-27.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

31.26%

6.22%

+25.04%

Volatility

BTCC.TO vs. L.TO - Volatility Comparison

Purpose Bitcoin CAD ETF Currency Hedged Units (BTCC.TO) has a higher volatility of 13.31% compared to Loblaw Companies Limited (L.TO) at 6.47%. This indicates that BTCC.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than L.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BTCC.TOL.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.31%

6.47%

+6.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.22%

16.19%

+18.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.90%

21.21%

+22.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

55.04%

18.94%

+36.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

56.35%

20.39%

+35.96%

Dividends

BTCC.TO vs. L.TO - Dividend Comparison

BTCC.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while L.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BTCC.TO
Purpose Bitcoin CAD ETF Currency Hedged Units
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
L.TO
Loblaw Companies Limited
0.91%2.19%4.20%5.43%5.28%5.40%8.15%7.40%6.45%7.84%7.27%7.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


BTCC.TO and L.TO have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BTCC.TO and L.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer