BTC vs. GFOF
BTC (Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust ETF) and GFOF (Grayscale Future of Finance ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BTC is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Grayscale, while GFOF is a Blockchain fund tracking the Bloomberg Grayscale Future of Finance Index. BTC is actively managed, while GFOF is passively managed. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BTC charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for GFOF.
Performance
BTC vs. GFOF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BTC
- 1D
- -3.96%
- 1M
- -21.06%
- YTD
- -31.66%
- 6M
- -31.44%
- 1Y
- -43.50%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GFOF
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BTC vs. GFOF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
BTC Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust ETF | -31.66% | -7.50% | 41.93% |
GFOF Grayscale Future of Finance ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 49.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between BTC and GFOF is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2024 | 0.28 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BTC vs. GFOF — Risk / Return Rank
BTC
GFOF
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BTC vs. GFOF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust ETF (BTC) and Grayscale Future of Finance ETF (GFOF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BTC | GFOF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.84 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.83 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.42 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BTC vs. GFOF - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BTC | GFOF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.37% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -52.37% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -52.37% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.73% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 30.70% | — | — |
Volatility
BTC vs. GFOF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BTC | GFOF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.21% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.53% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.39% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 48.29% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.29% | — | — |
BTC vs. GFOF - Expense Ratio Comparison
BTC has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than GFOF's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
BTC vs. GFOF - Dividend Comparison
Neither BTC nor GFOF has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BTC Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GFOF Grayscale Future of Finance ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.55% | 4.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BTC and GFOF have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BTC is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BTC is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for GFOF.
BTC and GFOF have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
BTC is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while GFOF is Blockchain. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for BTC and 0.70% for GFOF.
Find the right allocation for BTC and GFOF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer