BTC vs. BTCI
BTC (Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust ETF) and BTCI (NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BTC returned -38.61% vs -33.43% for BTCI. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. BTC charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for BTCI.
Performance
BTC vs. BTCI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BTC achieves a -25.36% return, which is significantly lower than BTCI's -22.74% return.
BTC
- 1D
- -2.73%
- 1M
- -18.40%
- YTD
- -25.36%
- 6M
- -29.74%
- 1Y
- -38.61%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BTCI
- 1D
- -2.56%
- 1M
- -16.29%
- YTD
- -22.74%
- 6M
- -26.41%
- 1Y
- -33.43%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BTC vs. BTCI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
BTC Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust ETF | -25.36% | -7.50% | 41.45% |
BTCI NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF | -22.74% | -1.09% | 28.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between BTC and BTCI is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2024 | 0.99 |
The correlation between BTC and BTCI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BTC vs. BTCI — Risk / Return Rank
BTC
BTCI
BTC vs. BTCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust ETF (BTC) and NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BTC | BTCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 0.87 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.78 | -0.75 | -0.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.36 | -1.34 | -0.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BTC | BTCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.89 | -0.86 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.00 | -0.03 | +0.03 |
Drawdowns
BTC vs. BTCI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTC drawdown since its inception was -49.34%, which is greater than BTCI's maximum drawdown of -44.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTC and BTCI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BTC | BTCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.34% | -44.98% | -4.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -49.34% | -44.98% | -4.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -47.98% | -42.87% | -5.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.61% | -15.18% | -1.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 28.38% | 25.05% | +3.33% |
Volatility
BTC vs. BTCI - Volatility Comparison
Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust ETF (BTC) has a higher volatility of 9.40% compared to NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI) at 8.35%. This indicates that BTC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BTCI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BTC | BTCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.40% | 8.35% | +1.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.45% | 30.94% | +3.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.69% | 38.93% | +4.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 48.30% | 40.11% | +8.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.30% | 40.11% | +8.19% |
BTC vs. BTCI - Expense Ratio Comparison
BTC has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than BTCI's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
BTC vs. BTCI - Dividend Comparison
BTC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BTCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 43.16%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BTC Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BTCI NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF | 43.16% | 36.46% | 6.76% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, BTC and BTCI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
BTC has higher volatility (9.40%) compared to BTCI (8.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTC dropped -49.34% vs BTCI's -44.98%.
On 1-year performance, BTCI leads with -33.43% vs -38.61% for BTC. On fees, BTC is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, BTCI has been the lower-risk option at 8.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BTCI has performed better with a -33.43% return vs -38.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BTC is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for BTCI.
BTCI has the higher dividend yield at 43.16%, compared with 0.00% for BTC.
They also come from different issuers: Grayscale and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for BTC and 0.99% for BTCI.
BTCI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.86 vs -0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BTC and BTCI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer