PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BTC-USD vs. EZA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BTC-USD vs. EZA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bitcoin (BTC-USD) and iShares MSCI South Africa ETF (EZA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTC-USD achieves a -26.27% return, which is significantly lower than EZA's -2.81% return. Over the past 10 years, BTC-USD has outperformed EZA with an annualized return of 57.23%, while EZA has yielded a comparatively lower 8.12% annualized return.


BTC-USD

1D
1.71%
1M
-20.43%
YTD
-26.27%
6M
-28.52%
1Y
-39.20%
3Y*
36.94%
5Y*
9.74%
10Y*
57.23%

EZA

1D
0.89%
1M
-5.12%
YTD
-2.81%
6M
2.77%
1Y
33.90%
3Y*
23.45%
5Y*
9.50%
10Y*
8.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BTC-USD vs. EZA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BTC-USD
Bitcoin
-26.27%-6.27%120.76%155.82%-64.23%59.40%304.57%94.10%-73.37%1,324.24%
EZA
iShares MSCI South Africa ETF
-2.81%75.20%7.16%1.51%-5.18%7.91%-5.19%9.83%-25.24%36.03%

Correlation

The correlation between BTC-USD and EZA is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2012

0.08

Over the past year, BTC-USD and EZA have become more correlated (0.30) than their long-term average of 0.08, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BTC-USD vs. EZA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTC-USD
BTC-USD Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
BTC-USD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTC-USD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTC-USD Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
BTC-USD Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTC-USD Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

EZA
EZA Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
EZA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EZA Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
EZA Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
EZA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
EZA Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTC-USD vs. EZA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitcoin (BTC-USD) and iShares MSCI South Africa ETF (EZA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BTC-USDEZADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.87

1.18

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.77

1.31

-2.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.33

3.41

-4.74

BTC-USD vs. EZA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BTC-USD Sharpe Ratio is -0.92, which is lower than the EZA Sharpe Ratio of 0.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTC-USD and EZA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BTC-USD vs. EZA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTC-USD drawdown since its inception was -85.30%, which is greater than EZA's maximum drawdown of -64.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTC-USD and EZA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BTC-USDEZADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.30%

-64.64%

-20.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-51.21%

-23.31%

-27.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-51.21%

-23.31%

-27.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-76.67%

-34.94%

-41.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-83.80%

-62.25%

-21.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-48.27%

-18.05%

-30.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-42.36%

-16.92%

-25.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

35.16%

8.93%

+26.23%

Volatility

BTC-USD vs. EZA - Volatility Comparison

Bitcoin (BTC-USD) has a higher volatility of 11.97% compared to iShares MSCI South Africa ETF (EZA) at 11.34%. This indicates that BTC-USD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EZA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BTC-USDEZADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.97%

11.34%

+0.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.64%

27.03%

+7.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.59%

31.92%

+3.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.57%

28.86%

+15.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

56.61%

31.43%

+25.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


BTC-USD and EZA have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BTC-USD has higher volatility (11.97%) compared to EZA (11.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTC-USD dropped -85.30% vs EZA's -64.64%.

EZA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.95 vs -0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BTC-USD and EZA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer