BTC-USD vs. ALMU

Last updated Jul 10, 2026

BTC-USD (Bitcoin) is a cryptocurrency, while ALMU (Aeluma, Inc) is a stock. Over the past 3 years, BTC-USD returned 27.51%/yr vs 85.05%/yr for ALMU. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

BTC-USD vs. ALMU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bitcoin (BTC-USD) and Aeluma, Inc (ALMU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTC-USD achieves a -27.93% return, which is significantly lower than ALMU's 6.29% return.

BTC-USD

• 1D: 1.32%
• 1M: 2.22%
• 6M: -30.73%
• YTD: -27.93%
• 1Y: -43.34%
• 3Y*: 27.51%
• 5Y*: 13.47%
• 10Y*: 57.99%

ALMU

• 1D: 2.87%
• 1M: -19.10%
• 6M: -18.38%
• YTD: 6.29%
• 1Y: 12.17%
• 3Y*: 85.05%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BTC-USD vs. ALMU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
BTC-USD Bitcoin	-27.93%	-6.27%	120.76%	155.82%	-2.06%
ALMU Aeluma, Inc	6.29%	124.44%	163.79%	38.10%	5.00%

Correlation

The correlation between BTC-USD and ALMU is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.20
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2022	0.11

Return for Risk

BTC-USD vs. ALMU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTC-USD

BTC-USD Risk / Return Rank: 20
BTC-USD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
BTC-USD Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
BTC-USD Omega Ratio Rank: 22
BTC-USD Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
BTC-USD Martin Ratio Rank: 7

ALMU

ALMU Risk / Return Rank: 55
ALMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
ALMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
ALMU Omega Ratio Rank: 59
ALMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
ALMU Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTC-USD vs. ALMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitcoin (BTC-USD) and Aeluma, Inc (ALMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BTC-USD	ALMU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.01	0.10	-1.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.47	1.13	-2.60
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.85	1.13	-0.28
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.82	0.22	-1.04
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.34	0.40	-1.75

BTC-USD vs. ALMU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BTC-USD Sharpe Ratio is -1.01, which is lower than the ALMU Sharpe Ratio of 0.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTC-USD and ALMU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BTC-USD vs. ALMU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTC-USD drawdown since its inception was -85.30%, which is greater than ALMU's maximum drawdown of -55.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTC-USD and ALMU.

Drawdown Indicators

	BTC-USD	ALMU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-85.30%	-55.37%	-29.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-53.08%	-55.37%	+2.29%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-53.08%	-55.37%	+2.29%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-76.67%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-83.80%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-49.44%	-42.05%	-7.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-42.53%	-23.67%	-18.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	31.20%	30.25%	+0.95%

Volatility

BTC-USD vs. ALMU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Bitcoin (BTC-USD) is 9.25%, while Aeluma, Inc (ALMU) has a volatility of 25.12%. This indicates that BTC-USD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ALMU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BTC-USD	ALMU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.25%	25.12%	-15.87%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	34.87%	94.37%	-59.50%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	35.75%	124.76%	-89.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	43.96%	123.13%	-79.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	56.32%	123.13%	-66.81%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BTC-USD and ALMU in my portfolio?

BTC-USD and ALMU have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BTC-USD or ALMU?

ALMU has higher volatility (25.12%) compared to BTC-USD (9.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTC-USD dropped -85.30% vs ALMU's -55.37%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ALMU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.10 vs -1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.