PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BTBFX vs. SCLAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BTBFX vs. SCLAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Boston Trust Asset Management Fund (BTBFX) and SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Capital Stability Fund (SCLAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTBFX achieves a 2.34% return, which is significantly lower than SCLAX's 2.66% return. Over the past 10 years, BTBFX has outperformed SCLAX with an annualized return of 8.76%, while SCLAX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.24% annualized return.


BTBFX

1D
-0.34%
1M
1.37%
YTD
2.34%
6M
1.72%
1Y
10.30%
3Y*
9.35%
5Y*
6.01%
10Y*
8.76%

SCLAX

1D
0.10%
1M
1.16%
YTD
2.66%
6M
2.77%
1Y
7.12%
3Y*
6.19%
5Y*
3.50%
10Y*
3.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BTBFX vs. SCLAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BTBFX
Boston Trust Asset Management Fund
2.34%7.87%11.17%13.73%-14.62%21.64%7.89%25.88%-1.60%14.60%
SCLAX
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Capital Stability Fund
2.66%6.49%4.92%6.96%-3.74%1.72%3.30%7.91%-0.67%3.88%

Correlation

The correlation between BTBFX and SCLAX is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013

0.67

The correlation between BTBFX and SCLAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BTBFX vs. SCLAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTBFX
BTBFX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
BTBFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTBFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTBFX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
BTBFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTBFX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

SCLAX
SCLAX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
SCLAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCLAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCLAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
SCLAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCLAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTBFX vs. SCLAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Boston Trust Asset Management Fund (BTBFX) and SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Capital Stability Fund (SCLAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BTBFXSCLAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.58

-0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.57

3.12

-1.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.58

12.54

-5.96

BTBFX vs. SCLAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BTBFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is lower than the SCLAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTBFX and SCLAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BTBFXSCLAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.38

2.76

-1.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

1.14

-0.66

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

1.18

-0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.73

1.02

-0.29

Drawdowns

BTBFX vs. SCLAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTBFX drawdown since its inception was -27.87%, which is greater than SCLAX's maximum drawdown of -5.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTBFX and SCLAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BTBFXSCLAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.87%

-5.59%

-22.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.67%

-2.32%

-4.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.80%

-3.41%

-8.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.02%

-5.59%

-15.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.56%

-5.59%

-19.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.52%

0.00%

-0.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.52%

-1.15%

-2.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.58%

0.58%

+1.00%

Volatility

BTBFX vs. SCLAX - Volatility Comparison

Boston Trust Asset Management Fund (BTBFX) has a higher volatility of 1.72% compared to SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Capital Stability Fund (SCLAX) at 0.95%. This indicates that BTBFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCLAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BTBFXSCLAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.72%

0.95%

+0.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.53%

2.07%

+3.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.56%

2.63%

+4.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.48%

3.08%

+9.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.01%

2.76%

+10.25%

BTBFX vs. SCLAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BTBFX has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is higher than SCLAX's 0.62% expense ratio.


Dividends

BTBFX vs. SCLAX - Dividend Comparison

BTBFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.62%, more than SCLAX's 1.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BTBFX
Boston Trust Asset Management Fund
11.62%11.89%6.29%6.46%4.60%1.48%5.60%0.99%4.35%1.05%5.14%5.92%
SCLAX
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Capital Stability Fund
1.83%1.88%7.87%4.06%1.90%2.79%1.01%4.67%0.54%3.77%0.69%1.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


BTBFX and SCLAX have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BTBFX has higher volatility (1.72%) compared to SCLAX (0.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTBFX dropped -27.87% vs SCLAX's -5.59%.

SCLAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.76 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BTBFX and SCLAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer