PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BTB-UN.TO vs. PLZ-UN.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BTB-UN.TO vs. PLZ-UN.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BTB Real Estate Investment Trust (BTB-UN.TO) and Plaza Retail REIT (PLZ-UN.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTB-UN.TO achieves a -5.61% return, which is significantly lower than PLZ-UN.TO's 6.30% return. Over the past 10 years, BTB-UN.TO has outperformed PLZ-UN.TO with an annualized return of 6.75%, while PLZ-UN.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 5.98% annualized return.


BTB-UN.TO

1D
0.27%
1M
-4.20%
YTD
-5.61%
6M
-1.91%
1Y
11.34%
3Y*
14.83%
5Y*
6.66%
10Y*
6.75%

PLZ-UN.TO

1D
0.00%
1M
0.07%
YTD
6.30%
6M
11.02%
1Y
23.23%
3Y*
11.17%
5Y*
6.89%
10Y*
5.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BTB-UN.TO vs. PLZ-UN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BTB-UN.TO
BTB Real Estate Investment Trust
-5.61%32.15%26.75%-11.94%-3.12%24.45%-24.88%29.71%3.76%12.35%
PLZ-UN.TO
Plaza Retail REIT
6.30%30.09%3.87%-11.82%1.15%39.55%-14.33%25.75%-2.54%-9.66%

Correlation

The correlation between BTB-UN.TO and PLZ-UN.TO is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2006

0.17

The correlation between BTB-UN.TO and PLZ-UN.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (all time) to 0.38 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BTB-UN.TO:

CA$332.66M

PLZ-UN.TO:

CA$495.47M

EPS

BTB-UN.TO:

CA$0.26

PLZ-UN.TO:

CA$0.53

PE Ratio

BTB-UN.TO:

14.39

PLZ-UN.TO:

8.44

PEG Ratio

BTB-UN.TO:

1.29

PLZ-UN.TO:

0.90

PS Ratio

BTB-UN.TO:

2.61

PLZ-UN.TO:

3.79

PB Ratio

BTB-UN.TO:

0.67

PLZ-UN.TO:

0.87

Total Revenue (TTM)

BTB-UN.TO:

CA$127.69M

PLZ-UN.TO:

CA$130.81M

Gross Profit (TTM)

BTB-UN.TO:

CA$72.80M

PLZ-UN.TO:

CA$84.08M

EBITDA (TTM)

BTB-UN.TO:

CA$58.10M

PLZ-UN.TO:

CA$91.98M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BTB-UN.TO vs. PLZ-UN.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTB-UN.TO
BTB-UN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
BTB-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTB-UN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTB-UN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
BTB-UN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTB-UN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

PLZ-UN.TO
PLZ-UN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
PLZ-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLZ-UN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLZ-UN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
PLZ-UN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLZ-UN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTB-UN.TO vs. PLZ-UN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BTB Real Estate Investment Trust (BTB-UN.TO) and Plaza Retail REIT (PLZ-UN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BTB-UN.TOPLZ-UN.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.32

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.93

3.12

-2.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.45

8.76

-6.30

BTB-UN.TO vs. PLZ-UN.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BTB-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is lower than the PLZ-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTB-UN.TO and PLZ-UN.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BTB-UN.TOPLZ-UN.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

1.67

-0.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

0.39

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

0.30

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.09

0.29

-0.20

Drawdowns

BTB-UN.TO vs. PLZ-UN.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTB-UN.TO drawdown since its inception was -86.00%, which is greater than PLZ-UN.TO's maximum drawdown of -54.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTB-UN.TO and PLZ-UN.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BTB-UN.TOPLZ-UN.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.00%

-54.55%

-31.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.27%

-7.49%

-5.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.04%

-12.80%

-2.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.43%

-26.22%

-1.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.27%

-42.12%

-15.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.54%

-1.11%

-9.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.80%

-12.96%

-21.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.01%

2.66%

+2.35%

Volatility

BTB-UN.TO vs. PLZ-UN.TO - Volatility Comparison

BTB Real Estate Investment Trust (BTB-UN.TO) has a higher volatility of 6.17% compared to Plaza Retail REIT (PLZ-UN.TO) at 2.40%. This indicates that BTB-UN.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PLZ-UN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BTB-UN.TOPLZ-UN.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.17%

2.40%

+3.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.22%

10.43%

+0.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.09%

13.96%

+0.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.64%

17.70%

-0.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.40%

20.04%

+3.36%

Dividends

BTB-UN.TO vs. PLZ-UN.TO - Dividend Comparison

BTB-UN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.02%, more than PLZ-UN.TO's 6.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BTB-UN.TO
BTB Real Estate Investment Trust
8.02%7.33%9.82%10.24%8.22%7.35%9.63%8.12%9.66%9.15%9.40%9.52%
PLZ-UN.TO
Plaza Retail REIT
6.31%6.53%7.91%7.61%6.25%5.93%7.76%6.13%7.21%6.34%5.20%5.64%

Financials

BTB-UN.TO vs. PLZ-UN.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between BTB Real Estate Investment Trust and Plaza Retail REIT. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


24.00M26.00M28.00M30.00M32.00M34.00M20222023202420252026
31.96M
33.46M
(BTB-UN.TO) Total Revenue
(PLZ-UN.TO) Total Revenue
Values in CAD except per share items

BTB-UN.TO vs. PLZ-UN.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between BTB Real Estate Investment Trust and Plaza Retail REIT over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

55.0%60.0%65.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
55.5%
63.8%
Portfolio components
BTB-UN.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BTB Real Estate Investment Trust reported a gross profit of 17.74M and revenue of 31.96M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.5%.

PLZ-UN.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Plaza Retail REIT reported a gross profit of 21.34M and revenue of 33.46M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 63.8%.

BTB-UN.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BTB Real Estate Investment Trust reported an operating income of 17.45M and revenue of 31.96M, resulting in an operating margin of 54.6%.

PLZ-UN.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Plaza Retail REIT reported an operating income of 16.70M and revenue of 33.46M, resulting in an operating margin of 49.9%.

BTB-UN.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BTB Real Estate Investment Trust reported a net income of 8.36M and revenue of 31.96M, resulting in a net margin of 26.2%.

PLZ-UN.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Plaza Retail REIT reported a net income of 12.73M and revenue of 33.46M, resulting in a net margin of 38.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BTB-UN.TO and PLZ-UN.TO have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BTB-UN.TO and PLZ-UN.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer