BTAL vs. IAUM

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

BTAL (AGFiQ US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund) and IAUM (iShares Gold Trust Micro) are both exchange-traded funds - BTAL is a Long-Short fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Thematic Market Neutral Anti-Beta Total Return Index, while IAUM is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BTAL returned -12.17%/yr vs 29.28%/yr for IAUM. At a correlation of -0.13, they often move in opposite directions. BTAL charges 2.11%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for IAUM.

Performance

BTAL vs. IAUM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AGFiQ US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund (BTAL) and iShares Gold Trust Micro (IAUM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTAL achieves a -20.15% return, which is significantly lower than IAUM's -2.40% return.

BTAL

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: -4.17%
• YTD: -20.15%
• 6M: -19.27%
• 1Y: -37.44%
• 3Y*: -12.17%
• 5Y*: -4.94%
• 10Y*: -5.05%

IAUM

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: -9.51%
• YTD: -2.40%
• 6M: -2.08%
• 1Y: 22.55%
• 3Y*: 29.28%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BTAL vs. IAUM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BTAL AGFiQ US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund	-20.15%	-20.17%	12.83%	-15.11%	20.48%	5.08%
IAUM iShares Gold Trust Micro	-2.40%	64.27%	27.04%	13.12%	-0.49%	3.87%

Correlation

The correlation between BTAL and IAUM is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.18
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.16
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2021	-0.13

BTAL vs. IAUM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BTAL	IAUM
Technology	19.5%	-
Financial Services	14.9%	-
Industrials	13.7%	-
Consumer Cyclical	12.8%	-
Healthcare	10.2%	-
Real Estate	6.2%	100.0%
Consumer Defensive	5.6%	-
Utilities	5.2%	-
Energy	4.4%	-
Basic Materials	4.0%	-
Communication Services	3.4%	-

Return for Risk

BTAL vs. IAUM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTAL

BTAL Risk / Return Rank: 0
BTAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
BTAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
BTAL Omega Ratio Rank: 0
BTAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
BTAL Martin Ratio Rank: 1

IAUM

IAUM Risk / Return Rank: 27
IAUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
IAUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
IAUM Omega Ratio Rank: 31
IAUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
IAUM Martin Ratio Rank: 25

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTAL vs. IAUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AGFiQ US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund (BTAL) and iShares Gold Trust Micro (IAUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BTAL	IAUM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.64	0.90	-2.54
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-2.56	1.26	-3.82
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.73	1.19	-0.45
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.98	1.00	-1.98
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.64	2.87	-4.51

BTAL vs. IAUM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BTAL Sharpe Ratio is -1.64, which is lower than the IAUM Sharpe Ratio of 0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTAL and IAUM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BTAL vs. IAUM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTAL drawdown since its inception was -50.28%, which is greater than IAUM's maximum drawdown of -24.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTAL and IAUM.

Drawdown Indicators

	BTAL	IAUM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.28%	-24.37%	-25.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-37.50%	-24.37%	-13.13%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-45.16%	-24.37%	-20.79%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-45.16%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-50.28%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-50.23%	-21.99%	-28.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.01%	-5.38%	-16.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	22.38%	8.46%	+13.92%

Volatility

BTAL vs. IAUM - Volatility Comparison

AGFiQ US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund (BTAL) has a higher volatility of 8.74% compared to iShares Gold Trust Micro (IAUM) at 7.71%. This indicates that BTAL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IAUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BTAL	IAUM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.74%	7.71%	+1.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.58%	23.82%	-7.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.49%	27.06%	-4.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.96%	18.05%	+0.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.33%	18.05%	-0.72%

BTAL vs. IAUM - Expense Ratio Comparison

BTAL has a 2.11% expense ratio, which is higher than IAUM's 0.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

BTAL vs. IAUM - Dividend Comparison

BTAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.11%, while IAUM has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BTAL AGFiQ US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund	3.11%	2.49%	3.49%	6.14%	1.01%	0.00%	0.00%	0.88%	0.39%
IAUM iShares Gold Trust Micro	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BTAL and IAUM in my portfolio?

BTAL and IAUM have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BTAL or IAUM?

BTAL has higher volatility (8.74%) compared to IAUM (7.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTAL dropped -50.28% vs IAUM's -24.37%.

Which ETF is better, BTAL or IAUM?

On 3-year performance, IAUM leads with 29.28% vs -12.17% for BTAL. On fees, IAUM is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, IAUM has been the lower-risk option at 7.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BTAL or IAUM?

Over the 3-year period, IAUM has performed better with a 29.28% return vs -12.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BTAL or IAUM?

IAUM is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 2.11% for BTAL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BTAL or IAUM?

BTAL has the higher dividend yield at 3.11%, compared with 0.00% for IAUM.

What is the main difference between BTAL and IAUM?

BTAL is categorized as Long-Short, while IAUM is Gold. BTAL tracks Dow Jones U.S. Thematic Market Neutral Anti-Beta Total Return Index, while IAUM tracks LBMA Gold Price PM. They also come from different issuers: AGF and iShares. Their fees differ too: 2.11% for BTAL and 0.09% for IAUM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IAUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.90 vs -1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.